Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

13.2K
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
13.2K
Vaccinations01:51

Vaccinations

45.3K
Overview
45.3K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.6K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.6K
Controls in Experiments01:13

Controls in Experiments

10.4K
When conducting an experiment, it is crucial to have control to reduce bias and accurately measure the dependent variables. It also marks the results more reliable. Controls are elements in an experiment that have the same characteristics as the treatment groups but are not affected by the independent variable. By sorting these data into control and experimental conditions, the relationship between the dependent and independent variables can be drawn. A randomized experiment always includes a...
10.4K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.2K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.2K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

174
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
174

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Large Language Model Chatbot Conversations vs Public Health Materials and Parental HPV Vaccination Intentions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Responsible AI for Personalized Patient Education and Engagement Across Medical Conditions: Leveraging Multi-Agent LLMs, Ambient Technology, and NotebookLM-A Case Study in Diabetes Education and Limb Preservation.

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association·2026
Same author

Admission Delays in Receiving Treatment for Cannabis Use Disorder Among U.S. Adolescents.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
Same author

Fluorescence Detection of Alpha-Synuclein Aggregates in the Gut Using a Peptide Probe.

ACS chemical neuroscience·2026
Same author

2025 Canadian Surgery Forum: Sept. 17-20, 2025.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2025
Same author

The impact of neuroscience education therapy, behavioral economics, and digital navigators on patient migraine treatment adherence to a mobile health application: a prospective pilot randomized controlled trial.

NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice
08:52

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice

Published on: February 22, 2019

10.8K

Different vaccination debunking interventions: a randomized, controlled experiment estimating "backfiring" and

Jennifer C Morgan1, Melanie L Kornides1, Jeremy Lee2

  • 1Department of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, United States.

Vaccine
|August 29, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Correcting vaccine misinformation with a "myth followed by fact" approach can strengthen COVID-19 booster intentions in vaccinated individuals. This strategy did not weaken intentions in any group, countering backfire concerns.

Keywords:
Covid-19Health acommunicationMessage effectsMisinformation correctionMyth debunkingVaccine hesitancy

More Related Videos

In Vivo Assay for Detection of Antigen-specific T-cell Cytolytic Function Using a Vaccination Model
07:05

In Vivo Assay for Detection of Antigen-specific T-cell Cytolytic Function Using a Vaccination Model

Published on: November 28, 2017

10.0K
Optimized Interferon-gamma ELISpot Assay to Measure T Cell Responses in the Guinea Pig Model after Vaccination
08:13

Optimized Interferon-gamma ELISpot Assay to Measure T Cell Responses in the Guinea Pig Model after Vaccination

Published on: January 20, 2019

21.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice
08:52

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice

Published on: February 22, 2019

10.8K
In Vivo Assay for Detection of Antigen-specific T-cell Cytolytic Function Using a Vaccination Model
07:05

In Vivo Assay for Detection of Antigen-specific T-cell Cytolytic Function Using a Vaccination Model

Published on: November 28, 2017

10.0K
Optimized Interferon-gamma ELISpot Assay to Measure T Cell Responses in the Guinea Pig Model after Vaccination
08:13

Optimized Interferon-gamma ELISpot Assay to Measure T Cell Responses in the Guinea Pig Model after Vaccination

Published on: January 20, 2019

21.8K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Behavioral Science
  • Communication Studies

Background:

  • Vaccine misinformation poses a significant barrier to achieving high immunization rates.
  • Existing strategies to correct misinformation include three common message structures, but their effectiveness and potential for negative impacts (backfiring) remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally evaluate the impact of three distinct misinformation-correction message structures on COVID-19 vaccine and booster intentions.
  • To assess whether these message structures strengthen or weaken vaccination intentions, particularly among individuals with safety concerns.

Main Methods:

  • A pre-registered, survey-embedded experiment was conducted with U.S. adults expressing vaccine safety concerns.
  • Participants were randomized to a control group or one of three message conditions: myth-then-fact, fact-myth-fact, or fact-only.
  • Intentions to receive an initial COVID-19 vaccine or booster were measured and analyzed using ordinal logistic regression.

Main Results:

  • The myth-followed-by-fact message structure significantly increased booster vaccination intentions among participants who had already received their initial COVID-19 vaccine.
  • No significant differences in vaccination intentions were observed between the control group and any of the misinformation-correction conditions for individuals not yet started on the initial vaccine series.
  • No evidence of 'backfiring' was found, as none of the message structures weakened vaccination intentions in any participant group.

Conclusions:

  • The 'myth followed by fact' approach is effective in strengthening booster vaccination intentions among the already vaccinated population.
  • Concerns about misinformation correction strategies backfiring were not supported by the study's findings.
  • Targeted messaging, like 'myth followed by fact,' may be a valuable tool for public health communication to improve vaccine uptake.