Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Guided Valve Sizing for Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement
Published on: January 20, 2022
Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram guidance for pulmonary valve replacement timing in repaired
Joshua Mayourian1, Lynn A Sleeper1, Vedang Diwanji1
1Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Background:
Optimal timing of pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) in repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) remains challenging. We hypothesized that pre-PVR artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) may inform optimal PVR timing in rTOF.
Methods:
rTOF PVR patients at Boston Children's Hospital (BCH) and Toronto General Hospital (TGH) with analyzable ECGs ≤3 months pre-PVR were included. Patients undergoing PVR were propensity score-matched 1:1 to non-PVR patients. Patients were partitioned into risk tertiles based on pre-PVR AI-ECG probabilities of 5-year mortality: low-, intermediate-, and high-risk.
Results:
The PVR cohort included 605 patients (504 at Boston Children's Hospital (BCH), 101 at Toronto General Hospital (TGH); median age 20.3 [IQR, 13.6-32.0] years; median follow-up 7.5 [IQR, 4.7-10.6] years; 3.6% mortality). Pre-PVR AI-ECG risk probability was predictive of post-PVR mortality (c-index 0.77), outperforming an established imaging-based model benchmark (c-index 0.70). AI-ECG remained an independent predictor when added to the benchmark model (P < .001) with a higher c-index of 0.84. Survival was similar between low- and intermediate-risk groups (97-98% 15-year survival; P = .6), with increased mortality for the high-risk group (83% 15-year survival; P = .009). The matched cohort demonstrated that PVR was associated with increased survival overall (HR 0.28 [95% CI, 0.13-0.60], P = .001). Exploratory analyses stratified by risk group tertiles showed survival benefit associated with PVR in the intermediate-risk (HR 0.10 [95% CI, 0.01-0.86]; P = .04) and high-risk (HR 0.3 [0.1-0.7]; P = .005) groups, but not in the low-risk group (P = .8).
Conclusions:
AI-ECG predicts post-PVR survival in rTOF patients with a PVR survival benefit in intermediate- and high-risk, but not low-risk, groups. AI-ECG may complement imaging biomarkers to determine rTOF PVR timing.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management

