Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Torts III01:26

Torts III

754
Types of Quasi-intentional Torts in Healthcare
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
754
Standards of Care I01:22

Standards of Care I

760
Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:
760
Torts II01:13

Torts II

686
Intentional torts in healthcare refer to deliberate actions that cause harm or infringe on the rights of others. Understanding these torts is crucial for healthcare professionals to avoid legal liabilities and maintain ethical standards in patient care.
686
Torts I01:14

Torts I

1.3K
Torts in nursing are wrongful acts that can harm patients and potentially lead to civil liability for the involved nurse. These wrongful acts range from unintentional errors to deliberate actions. Depending on the nature and severity of the tort, a nurse found liable may face financial penalties or disciplinary actions. Understanding the distinctions between intentional, quasi-intentional, and unintentional torts is crucial for nurses to mitigate risks and provide safe patient care.
Intentional...
1.3K
Standards of Care II01:19

Standards of Care II

725
Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:
725
Drug Regulation01:25

Drug Regulation

1.8K
Drug regulation encompasses the management of drug usage by evaluating its safety and efficacy through assessments conducted by regulatory authorities. Regrettably, the history of drug regulation is marred by several catastrophic events. One such incident is the Elixir Sulfanilamide tragedy, in which the toxic compound diethyl glycol was included in a sweet-tasting medication, leading to numerous fatalities. This event prompted the enactment of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in 1938. Under...
1.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Commercial prices relative to Medicare were lower under an employer-based reference pricing program.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same author

Low-Value Care Following Hospital and Private Equity Acquisition in Primary Care.

Medical care research and review : MCRR·2026
Same author

Changes in Maternal Care and Infant Health After Noneconomic Damage Cap Repeals.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Recent minimum wage policies and their association with suicide and poisoning deaths.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Impact on hospitals of price reductions for physician-administered biologics.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same author

Regulating quasi-legal markets: Evidence from pain management clinic laws.

Journal of public economics·2026
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery
04:14

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery

Published on: September 22, 2023

572

The Repeal of Noneconomic Damage Caps and Medical Malpractice Insurance Premiums.

Yuji Mizushima1, Christopher Whaley1,2, Hao Yu3

  • 1RAND, Santa Monica, California, USA.

Health Economics
|August 31, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Repealing noneconomic damage caps increases medical malpractice insurance premiums, particularly after state supreme court rulings and for surgical specialties. This suggests repeals have a greater impact than enactments.

Keywords:
medical malpractice insurancephysician liabilitypremiumsstate tort reform

More Related Videos

Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Allowing Reperfusion via Common Carotid Artery Repair in Mice
06:59

Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Allowing Reperfusion via Common Carotid Artery Repair in Mice

Published on: January 23, 2019

17.9K
Microvascular Decompression: Salient Surgical Principles and Technical Nuances
10:35

Microvascular Decompression: Salient Surgical Principles and Technical Nuances

Published on: July 5, 2011

46.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery
04:14

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery

Published on: September 22, 2023

572
Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Allowing Reperfusion via Common Carotid Artery Repair in Mice
06:59

Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Allowing Reperfusion via Common Carotid Artery Repair in Mice

Published on: January 23, 2019

17.9K
Microvascular Decompression: Salient Surgical Principles and Technical Nuances
10:35

Microvascular Decompression: Salient Surgical Principles and Technical Nuances

Published on: July 5, 2011

46.5K

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Medical malpractice law
  • Public policy

Background:

  • Noneconomic damage caps in medical malpractice lawsuits are debated due to potential impacts on physician costs and patient welfare.
  • State-level policies vary, with some enacting caps and others repealing them, reflecting ongoing controversy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the impact of repealing noneconomic damage caps on medical malpractice insurance premiums.
  • To compare the effects of different types of court decisions (State Supreme Court vs. State Circuit Court) on premium changes.
  • To investigate variations in premium impacts across different physician specialties.

Main Methods:

  • Difference-in-differences analysis was employed to assess the causal effect of repeals.
  • Data were analyzed to compare premium changes before and after repeal events.
  • The study differentiated impacts based on the level of court decision and physician specialty.

Main Results:

  • Repeals of noneconomic damage caps were found to increase insurance premiums.
  • Premium increases were significantly larger following State Supreme Court decisions compared to State Circuit Court decisions.
  • Obstetrics/gynecology and general surgery specialties experienced larger premium increases than internal medicine.

Conclusions:

  • Repealing noneconomic damage caps leads to higher medical malpractice insurance premiums.
  • The magnitude of premium increases is influenced by the scope of court decisions and physician specialty.
  • There may be an asymmetry in the effects of enacting versus repealing noneconomic damage caps.