Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025
Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
Preoperative Staging in Oral Cavity Cancer: Nationwide Practice and Concordance With Pathology
Hanneke Doremiek van Oorschot1,2, Julie Maria Leonardus Sijmons2,3,4, Jose Angelito Hardillo1
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Objectives:
The clarity of TNM-classification for oral cancer has a direct impact on healthcare resource allocation, treatment decisions, morbidity, and clinical outcomes. However, possible TNM ambiguity between hospitals exists due to the broad range of available diagnostics. Therefore, this study aims to assess current practice variation in preoperative staging for oral cavity cancer.
Materials And Methods:
All patients who underwent primary oral cavity cancer resection in the Netherlands between 2018 and 2021 were selected from the Dutch Head and Neck Audit database. Preoperative staging (cTN) was compared to definitive pathology staging (pTN) as the gold standard for assessing concordance at national and hospital levels.
Results:
Disease stage was upstaged in 27.5% of the patients. For T-classification analysis, 2458 patients were included. Accuracy for T-classification categories was 85.2%-93.1%, but significant hospital variation in overstaging and understaging was observed. For N-classification analysis, 1746 patients were included. Preoperative assessment of node involvement missed metastasis in 25.1% of the cN0 patients, resulting in 77.3% accuracy.
Conclusion:
Significant preoperative understaging of oral cancer calls the attention to the difficulties of the diagnostics of oral cancer. Although the accuracy of preoperative staging in oral cavity cancer is high, significant differences between hospitals were observed.
