Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.9K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.9K
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness01:14

Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness

1.9K
Avoidance learning and learned helplessness are critical concepts in understanding behavioral responses to negative stimuli.
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
1.9K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

976
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
976
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.7K
Instinctive Drift01:05

Instinctive Drift

314
Instinctive drift refers to the tendency of animals to revert to their innate behaviors despite repeated reinforcement. Breland and Breland demonstrated this concept in an experiment with a raccoon. The raccoon was trained to pick up two coins and place them in a container in exchange for food. Initially, the raccoon learned to associate the coins with food, making them a conditioned stimulus or a substitute for food. However, over time, the raccoon became less willing to put the coins into the...
314
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

152
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
152

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effort shapes empathy: Distinct aftereffects of cognitive and physical exertion on pain empathy.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same author

Effort produces after-effects costly for others but valued for self.

eLife·2026
Same author

Delaying rewards reduces egoism bias during prosocial acts.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2026
Same author

Biomimetic β-lapachone and hemin nanoassembly for intracellular oxidation cascade amplified ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma therapy.

Journal of nanobiotechnology·2026
Same author

Disentangling Uncertainty Signals in Neural Reward Dynamics.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Altered neural profile of reward evaluation under risk and ambiguity in intolerance of uncertainty.

Behaviour research and therapy·2026
Same journal

Neural Sensitivity to Conversational Inter-Speaker Gaps in the Broad Autism Phenotype.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Open Communication Can Lead to Equivalent EEG Data Quality for Black Women: Multilevel Modeling Interindividual Differences on Emotional Scene and Face Perception.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

What's in a Mean? Comparing Interbeat Interval Averaging Methods Across Variability Levels and Window Lengths.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Model-Free and Model-Based Learning in Human Fear Conditioning.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Examining the Impact of Acute Exercise and Arousal Reappraisal on Stressor-Evoked Psychological and Cardiovascular Responses.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Hierarchical Dimensions of Psychopathology.

Psychophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Neural Dynamics Underlying Uncertain Reward Evaluation in Individuals With Intolerance of Uncertainty.

Guanglong Liu1,2, Yongyi Liang1,2, Wendeng Yang1,2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.

Psychophysiology
|September 1, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Individuals with high intolerance of uncertainty (IU) show a general aversion to uncertainty. Their neural responses to unpredictable rewards differ from those with low IU, particularly in later stages of reward processing.

Keywords:
intolerance of uncertaintyneural dynamicsreward evaluationuncertainty

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

800
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

800
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) is a transdiagnostic factor in internalizing disorders.
  • Research has focused on IU's impact on threat processing, with less attention to reward processing.
  • Understanding IU's role in reward processing is crucial for internalizing disorder research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural dynamics of uncertain reward processing in individuals with high versus low IU.
  • To examine how different types of uncertainty (probability, time, magnitude) affect reward evaluation.
  • To identify IU-related differences in neural responses during reward feedback.

Main Methods:

  • Event-related potential (ERP) study using electroencephalography (EEG).
  • Comparison between a high-IU group (N=35) and a low-IU group (N=36).
  • Participants completed guessing tasks with predictable vs. unpredictable reward delivery (probability, time, magnitude).

Main Results:

  • High-IU group showed a behavioral aversion to uncertainty.
  • Low-IU group, not high-IU, showed sensitivity to predictable vs. unpredictable rewards in early reward processing (reward positivity), specifically for time uncertainty.
  • High-IU group, compared to low-IU, showed greater sensitivity to predictability vs. unpredictability in late reward processing (P3), irrespective of uncertainty type.

Conclusions:

  • Individual differences in IU are associated with distinct neural processing of uncertain rewards.
  • Findings suggest a valence-independent maladaptation in uncertainty processing in high IU.
  • This research highlights the importance of considering IU in understanding reward-based decision-making and internalizing disorders.