Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Acceptance of Risk and Confidence Assessing Avalanche Terrain and Conditions: A Large Cross-Sectional Study
Cameron C Shonnard1, Rondo J Bauer1, Lingchen Wang2
1School of Medicine, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, NV, USA.
Backcountry skiers
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Risk Management
- Outdoor Recreation
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic increased backcountry use, raising safety concerns.
- Understanding risk-taking behavior in the backcountry is crucial for safety.
- Assessing avalanche terrain hazards is a key skill for backcountry users.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify risk propensity and hazard assessment ability in backcountry skiers.
- To explore correlations between risk propensity, self-assessed ability, avalanche training, and experience.
- To identify factors influencing risk-taking behavior in the backcountry.
Main Methods:
- Anonymous online survey of 4792 backcountry skiers and snowboarders in the US and Canada.
- Analysis of correlations between risk propensity, hazard assessment confidence, avalanche training, experience, and days of skiing.
- Utilized Pearson correlation coefficients and multivariable linear regression models.
Main Results:
- Positive correlation found between hazard assessment confidence and risk propensity, training, experience, and skiing frequency.
- Females reported lower risk willingness and self-assessed ability compared to males.
- Over 30% of skiers without Level 1 avalanche training were confident in assessing complex terrain.
Conclusions:
- Avalanche education needs to align perceived abilities with actual skills to mitigate overconfidence.
- Formal avalanche education is positively associated with risk propensity and hazard assessment confidence.
- High confidence levels among undertrained skiers pose a significant safety risk.
More Related Videos
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
13:04Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Relative Risk
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...