Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Effects of cement application techniques on implant-supported single crowns
Hsiang Chih Yeh1, Xuedong Bai2, Yanning Chen3
1Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Purpose:
To investigate the effect of different cement application techniques on weight of cement, cement film thickness, and retention force of cement-retained implant-supported single crowns.
Material And Methods:
Thirty-two samples comprising a titanium abutment analogue and a lithium disilicate crown were prepared and randomly divided into four groups. After surface pre-treatments, crowns were luted to abutment analogues with resin cement, adopting four application techniques: margin of crown (MA), brush on crown (BA), gross application on crown (GA), and pre-seating with chair-side copy abutment (CCA). Weight of cement used was recorded, while the cement film thickness was measured on digital files acquired by Micro-CT. Crown dislodging forces were assessed via the tensile test, after which failure modes were observed and analysed.
Results:
CCA group (20.162 ± 2.385 mg) had a significantly lower cement usage than MA (26.149 ± 0.875 mg), BA (25.248 ± 0.644 mg), and GA (25.198 ± 1.226 mg) (P < 0.001). BA (187.06 ± 23.77 µm) presented significantly higher cement film thicknesses than those using other application techniques (155.20 ± 13.44 µm for MA, 152.39 ± 25.32 µm for GA, and 135.73 ± 27.42 µm for CCA) (P= 0.047, 0.027, and < 0.001, respectively). Four groups had comparable dislodging force with no significant difference on failure mode (P = 0.897).
Conclusions:
Cement application techniques significantly influenced the weight of cement and cement film thickness on implant-supported single crowns, while the crown dislodging force was not affected. Based on the study result, CCA technique was recommended for cementing implant-supported crowns. A new model was developed for the retention test of anatomical crowns.
Clinical Significance:
Cement-retained implant restorations are prone to complications induced by excess cement which can compromise clinical outcomes. The study evaluated the factor of cement application technique, proposing the CCA technique for its optimal balance in cement usage, crown retention, and clinical efficiency.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Cement I
Type I (Ordinary Portland Cement) is widely used for general construction where special properties are not required. It has moderate sulfate resistance and heat of hydration.
Type II (Modified Cement) offers moderate resistance to sulfate attack and a lower rate of heat development compared to Type I. It is suitable for structures in...
Hydration of Cement
Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in...
Setting Time of Cement
Types of Cement II
Soundness of Cement

