Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical and Economic Burden of Poor Bone Health in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Spine·2026
Same author

Risk factors for elevated endotracheal tube cuff pressure in anterior cervical spine surgery.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2026
Same author

Cage Overhang Ratio and Increased Radiographic Subsidence in Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

World neurosurgery·2026
Same author

Administration of ketogenic intervention as a potential treatment during post-traumatic brain injury recovery: a scoping review.

Frontiers in nutrition·2026
Same author

Management for Chronic Neck Pain: Identifying Groups at Risk for Increased Emergency Room Utilization and Healthcare Gaps.

Neurosurgery·2026
Same author

Superior displacement of the inflexion point does not predict proximal junctional kyphosis after fusion for adult spinal deformity.

Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model
06:18

Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model

Published on: May 24, 2024

2.3K

Prompt Engineering and Follow-Up Questioning Improves the Readability of Spine Surgery Questions in Large Language

Sohail Daulat1, Nikhil Dholaria2, Gregory Burnet1

  • 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

World Neurosurgery
|September 1, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Prompt engineering and follow-up questions significantly improve large language model (LLM) readability for spine surgery patient education. ChatGPT-4o generally produced more readable content than ChatGPT-5.

Keywords:
Artificial IntelligenceLarge Language ModelPrompt EngineeringReadabilitySpine

More Related Videos

3D Printing Model of a Patient's Specific Lumbar Vertebra
07:30

3D Printing Model of a Patient's Specific Lumbar Vertebra

Published on: April 14, 2023

2.1K
Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

681

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model
06:18

Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model

Published on: May 24, 2024

2.3K
3D Printing Model of a Patient's Specific Lumbar Vertebra
07:30

3D Printing Model of a Patient's Specific Lumbar Vertebra

Published on: April 14, 2023

2.1K
Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

681

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Spine Surgery

Background:

  • Patient education materials in spine surgery often exceed recommended reading levels.
  • Large language models (LLMs) show promise for generating educational content but need further study on readability and adaptability.
  • Assessing LLM performance in creating accessible patient information is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate which LLM model and prompting strategies enhance the readability of spine surgery patient education the most.
  • To compare the performance of newer LLM models in generating understandable content.
  • To identify optimal methods for improving LLM-generated educational materials.

Main Methods:

  • ChatGPT-4o and ChatGPT-5 were prompted with 45 spine surgery questions across five common procedures.
  • Responses were generated through five prompting phases, including baseline, follow-up clarification, sixth-grade level requests, rule-based prompting, and direct readability targeting.
  • Readability was assessed using multiple scoring systems (SMOG, FRE, FKGL, GFI, CLI) and analyzed statistically.

Main Results:

  • ChatGPT-4o generated significantly more readable responses than ChatGPT-5 across most phases (p<0.001).
  • The sixth-grade level request phase (Phase 2) resulted in the most readable answers, with over 51% meeting the target.
  • Follow-up clarification and simplified prompts were more effective than complex rule-based strategies for improving readability.

Conclusions:

  • Prompt engineering and follow-up questioning substantially improve LLM-generated spine surgery content readability for patients.
  • While ChatGPT-4o showed better readability, ChatGPT-5 provided more reliable citations.
  • Future research should validate these findings in real-world clinical settings beyond objective scoring.