Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training
Published on: August 24, 2017
Effects of teaching neuroplasticity on motivation, inhibitory control and task performance, and the role of mindset
Jérémie Blanchette Sarrasin1, Martin Riopel2, Geneviève Allaire-Duquette3
1Laboratory for Research in Neuroeducation (LRN), Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Team for Research in Science and Technology Education (EREST), Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Départment de didactique, Université du Québec à Montréal, P.O. Box 8888, Downtown Branch, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3P8, Canada.
Background:
Frequent and persistent errors resist teaching, partly due to difficulties in mobilizing inhibitory control. A promising strategy to address this challenge involves teaching students about neuroplasticity. Such instruction may indeed foster motivational beliefs (often referred to as growth mindset), which in turn could positively influence the mobilization of inhibitory control. This study investigated the effects of a neuroplasticity-based intervention on motivation (including constructs from mindset theory), inhibitory control and task performance.
Method:
The final sample included 44 10-12 y/o students recruited from French-speaking elementary schools in the Montreal area (Québec, Canada), primarily through an online advertisement posted on social media. They were assigned to either the experimental group (neuroplasticity intervention) or the control group. They completed a motivational questionnaire at both pretest and posttest and performed a fraction comparison task while undergoing fMRI scanning.
Results:
Results indicated that students who learned about neuroplasticity demonstrated significant improvements in motivation and greater activation of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), a brain region associated with inhibitory control. However, task performance did not significantly differ between groups. Notably, the change in perceived competence was the only motivational variable significantly associated with brain activity related to inhibitory control.
Conclusions:
These findings suggest that teaching neuroplasticity can both foster motivation and neural engagement, with perceived competence emerging as a central variable in this relationship. While the intervention did not produce direct effects on academic performance, it remains a promising cost-effective strategy to support students with inhibitory control difficulties and offers valuable insights for future educational interventions.
More Related Videos
09:48Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention
Published on: September 11, 2017
14:47Author Spotlight: Combined Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Probe Sensorimotor Control and Learning
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Neuroplasticity
Metacognition
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Long-term Potentiation
Hebbian LTP
LTP can occur when...
Cognitive Enhancers: Cholinesterase Inhibitors and NMDA Receptor Antagonists
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....