Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Labeling DNA Probes03:31

Labeling DNA Probes

8.3K
DNA probes are fragments of DNA labeled with a reporter tag to enable their detection or purification. The resulting labeled DNA probes can then hybridize to target nucleic acid sequences through complementary base-pairing, and may be used to recover or identify these regions.
Radioisotopes, fluorophores, or small molecule binding partners like biotin or digoxigenin, are the most widely used reporter tags for labeling DNA probes. These labels can be attached to the probe DNA molecule via...
8.3K
Southern Blot02:57

Southern Blot

20.2K
Agarose gel electrophoresis is very useful in separating DNA fragments by size. Running a DNA ladder containing fragments of the known length alongside the sample helps determine the approximate length of the sample DNA fragments. However, additional steps are needed to verify the sequence identity of the sample DNA fragments.
Denatured DNA fragments must be transferred onto a carrier membrane from the gel to make it accessible to a probe - a small ssDNA fragment complementary to the target DNA...
20.2K
FISH - Fluorescent In-situ Hybridization02:07

FISH - Fluorescent In-situ Hybridization

21.2K
Fluorescence in situ hybridization, or FISH, was developed in the early 1980s and has quickly become one of the most widely used techniques in cytogenetics. Labeled probes are used to bind complementary DNA or RNA sequences on a chromosome or in a region within a cell. Earlier, the probes could only be obtained by cloning or reverse transcription of a DNA template. Currently, the probe oligonucleotides can be synthesized synthetically. Additionally, with the advancement of optical techniques,...
21.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Role of Electrode Microstructuration in Electrochemical Aptamer-Based Biosensors for Localized Measurements.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2025
Same author

Modular DNA origami-based electrochemical detection of DNA and proteins.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Simple A-D<sub>2</sub>-A Nonfullerene Acceptors for Efficient Binary Bulk Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2025
Same author

"Binding" or "Binding and Switching"? A Perspective on Resolving Conformational Changes of Surface-Attached Biomolecular Receptors.

ACS sensors·2024
Same author

Ligand-Induced Folding in a Dopamine-Binding DNA Aptamer.

Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology·2024
Same author

Solution-based biophysical characterization of conformation change in structure-switching aptamers.

Quarterly reviews of biophysics·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 9, 2025

A Microfluidic-based Electrochemical Biochip for Label-free DNA Hybridization Analysis
14:53

A Microfluidic-based Electrochemical Biochip for Label-free DNA Hybridization Analysis

Published on: September 10, 2014

17.3K

Electrochemical and plasmonic detection methods yield comparable analytical performance for DNA hybridization.

Nicolas Fontaine1, Arielle Dauphin1, Miriam Gaida1

  • 1Département de chimie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1K 2R1, Canada. philippe.dauphin.ducharme@usherbrooke.ca.

The Analyst
|September 2, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study combined electrochemical and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) methods to analyze DNA biosensors. Both techniques showed similar performance, indicating SPR can guide DNA sensor development before costly modifications.

More Related Videos

Fabrication of Electrochemical-DNA Biosensors for the Reagentless Detection of Nucleic Acids, Proteins and Small Molecules
13:15

Fabrication of Electrochemical-DNA Biosensors for the Reagentless Detection of Nucleic Acids, Proteins and Small Molecules

Published on: June 1, 2011

33.8K
Development of an Electrochemical DNA Biosensor to Detect a Foodborne Pathogen
17:16

Development of an Electrochemical DNA Biosensor to Detect a Foodborne Pathogen

Published on: June 3, 2018

13.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 9, 2025

A Microfluidic-based Electrochemical Biochip for Label-free DNA Hybridization Analysis
14:53

A Microfluidic-based Electrochemical Biochip for Label-free DNA Hybridization Analysis

Published on: September 10, 2014

17.3K
Fabrication of Electrochemical-DNA Biosensors for the Reagentless Detection of Nucleic Acids, Proteins and Small Molecules
13:15

Fabrication of Electrochemical-DNA Biosensors for the Reagentless Detection of Nucleic Acids, Proteins and Small Molecules

Published on: June 1, 2011

33.8K
Development of an Electrochemical DNA Biosensor to Detect a Foodborne Pathogen
17:16

Development of an Electrochemical DNA Biosensor to Detect a Foodborne Pathogen

Published on: June 3, 2018

13.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biosensor technology
  • Analytical chemistry
  • Molecular biology

Background:

  • DNA-based biosensors are crucial for molecular target detection.
  • Transduction methods influence biosensor analytical performance, particularly with varying target size.
  • Understanding these differences is key to optimizing biosensor design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of DNA target length on biosensor performance using electrochemical and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) methods.
  • To compare the analytical performance of electrochemical and SPR transduction in DNA-based biosensors.
  • To propose a combined electrochemical-SPR (eSPR) approach for efficient DNA sensor development.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a combined electrochemical-SPR (eSPR) platform for simultaneous surface interrogation.
  • Engineering of redox-reporter-modified DNA interfaces with varying lengths.
  • Analysis of limits of detection and maximal responses upon binding of complementary DNA sequences.

Main Results:

  • Both electrochemical and SPR methods demonstrated comparable limits of detection.
  • Sigmoidal target-response curves were observed for both transduction methods.
  • Response magnitude varied monotonically with DNA sequence length, consistent across both techniques.

Conclusions:

  • The combined eSPR approach provides a comprehensive view of DNA-target interactions.
  • SPR can serve as a preliminary tool for optimizing DNA recognition elements, reducing costs associated with redox modifications.
  • This strategy accelerates the translation of DNA biosensors into practical sensing platforms.