Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation
Published on: October 15, 2021
Minimally Invasive Surgery vs Medical Management Alone for Intracerebral Hemorrhage: The MIND Randomized Clinical
Adam S Arthur1, Babak S Jahromi2, Paul S Saphier3,4
1Department of Neurosurgery, Semmes-Murphey Clinic and University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis.
Importance:
It remains uncertain whether surgical evacuation improves functional outcomes in patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).
Objective:
To compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery with the Artemis Neuro Evacuation Device to guideline-based medical management alone for spontaneous supratentorial ICH.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
The MIND open-label, multicenter randomized clinical trial randomized patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH in a 2:1 ratio to either minimally invasive surgery or medical management alone. Participants were enrolled at 32 participating global sites between February 6, 2018, and August 28, 2023. This article reports on the primary trial outcome. Of 4066 eligible adult patients (aged 18-80 years) with moderate- to large-volume supratentorial ICH (20-80 mL), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 6 or higher, and Glasgow Coma Scale score between 5 and 15, 154 were randomized to minimally invasive surgery and 82 to medical management. Data were analyzed from February to September 2024.
Intervention:
Minimally invasive surgery (within 72 hours of symptom onset) plus medical management or medical management alone.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The primary efficacy outcome was 180-day combined death and disability via ordinal modified Rankin Scale score (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]). The primary safety outcome was 30-day mortality.
Results:
Following an independent feasibility analysis prompted by the publication of positive results of a contemporaneous ICH trial, enrollment was stopped early at 236 participants. Overall median (IQR) participant age was 60 (50-70) years, 87 participants (36.9%) were female, 164 (69.5%) had primarily deep bleeds, and 72 (30.5%) had primarily lobar bleeds. Efficacy results of the primary model analysis suggested lack of evidence for the superiority of minimally invasive surgery over medical management (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 96% CI, 0.62-1.72; P = .45). The adjusted model's mean OR was also nonsignificantly greater than 1 (OR, 1.10; 96% CI, 0.66-1.85; P = .35). By 30 days, 11 participants (7.2%) in the surgery group and 8 (9.8%) in the medical management group died (difference, -2.5%; 95% CI, -11.7% to 4.8%).
Conclusions And Relevance:
In the MIND randomized clinical trial, minimally invasive surgery within 72 hours did not significantly reduce 30-day mortality or improve 180-day disability in patients with supratentorial ICH compared to medical management alone.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03342664.
More Related Videos
11:58Minimally Invasive Thumb-sized Pterional Craniotomy for Surgical Clip Ligation of Unruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms
Published on: August 11, 2015
09:14Pre-Chiasmatic, Single Injection of Autologous Blood to Induce Experimental Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in a Rat Model
Published on: June 18, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management