Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
Published on: September 20, 2024
The omnicausal model reveals the highly polyfactorial nature of complex diseases
Abstract:
Mendelian Randomization (MR) is a human genetics method for inferring causal relationships between risk factors and diseases. A common focus of MR studies has been on the causal inference of a single risk factor on a single disease. This has led to the successful discovery of numerous causal risk factors for disease. However, it remains unclear how much each causal risk factor contributes to disease collectively. Here, we introduce the concept of "causality explained", that provides an estimate of the causal variance explained by a phenome-wide set of risk factors on complex diseases to assess how much causality can be potentially explained. The model is based on principal component regression which is a multivariate linear regression based on principal component analysis. In complement, we propose the "polyfactorial index" to assess the trajectory of causality explained as risk factors are sequentially added into the model, to characterize the causal architecture for a complex disease. We demonstrate that our model correctly assesses the causality explained and causal architecture in simulations across a wide range of parameters. To build our model, we used a phenome-wide set of 222 traits from the UK Biobank compared to a set of 5 known risk factors for coronary artery disease. We observed that the phenome-wide set explains almot 45% of causality compared to 28.73% for the set of known risk factors. In addition, we tested our approach on 13 complex diseases and showed that the phenome-wide set can explain between 27% for anorexia to 80% for schizophrenia, with increasing trajectories of causality explained. We propose the "omnicausal model", which posits that a large number of risk factors explains a very small portion individually to disease but collectively explain most of the causal variance. We distinguished core and peripheral causal factors that explain respectively a larger and a smaller part of causal variance. This approach provides insights into the relative importance of individual risk factors as well as the collective impact of multiple causal risk factors on disease, providing insights into the causal architecture of disease.
Insights
Mendelian Randomization (MR) now quantifies how much causality is explained by many risk factors for complex diseases. A new "omnicausal model" reveals that numerous factors collectively explain most causal variance, not individually.
Area of Science:
- Human Genetics
- Complex Disease Etiology
- Statistical Inference
Background:
- Mendelian Randomization (MR) traditionally focuses on single risk factor-disease causal inference.
- The collective contribution of multiple causal risk factors to complex diseases remains largely unquantified.
- Understanding the cumulative impact of risk factors is crucial for disease etiology and prevention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and validate a novel framework for estimating "causality explained" by a phenome-wide set of risk factors.
- To develop the "polyfactorial index" for characterizing the causal architecture of complex diseases.
- To propose the "omnicausal model" for understanding the collective impact of numerous risk factors.
Main Methods:
- Utilized principal component regression, a multivariate linear regression technique based on principal component analysis.
- Applied the method to a phenome-wide set of 222 traits from the UK Biobank.
- Validated the model through simulations and application to 13 complex diseases.
Main Results:
- The phenome-wide set explained 45% of causality for coronary artery disease, compared to 28.73% for known risk factors.
- Causality explained ranged from 27% for anorexia to 80% for schizophrenia across 13 complex diseases.
- Demonstrated increasing trajectories of causality explained as risk factors were sequentially added.
Conclusions:
- The "omnicausal model" suggests numerous risk factors individually explain little but collectively explain most causal variance.
- Distinguished between core and peripheral causal factors based on their contribution to explained causal variance.
- This approach offers novel insights into the relative importance and collective impact of multiple risk factors on complex diseases.
Related Concept Videos
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Multicompartment Models: Overview
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
Causality in Epidemiology
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...
Genomics

