Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
Modified Naples Prognostic Score for Postoperative Prognostic Stratification in Patients with Oral Squamous Cell
Jingyi Ran1, Yalian Liu1, Xiaoxi Yi1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Background:
The Naples Prognostic Score (NPS) is a composite index that combines serum albumin (ALB), total cholesterol (TC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR). It has proven prognostic value across various cancers. However, its use in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has not been sufficiently recognized for disease-specific characteristics. This study aimed to create and validate a modified NPS (mNPS) specifically for OSCC, comparing its prognostic effectiveness to that of the conventional NPS and other established indices.
Methods:
A total of 479 patients with histologically confirmed OSCC who underwent curative-intent surgery between 2012 and 2019 were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to development (n=335) and validation (n=144) cohorts. Cohort-specific optimal cut-off values for ALB, TC, NLR, and LMR were determined using X-Tile software to construct the mNPS. Prognostic performance of mNPS was compared with conventional NPS, SII, SIRI, and CONUT using ROC analysis, C-index, and Cox regression. A nomogram incorporating mNPS and other independent risk factors was constructed and validated.
Results:
Multivariate Cox regression confirmed mNPS as an independent predictor of OS (Group 1: HR 2.18; Group 2: HR 3.10; P<0.01). The mNPS-based nomogram showed superior prognostic accuracy for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS with AUCs of 0.83, 0.80, and 0.83 in the development cohort, and 0.80, 0.79, and 0.82 in the validation cohort. Corresponding C-index values were 0.73 (OS), 0.72 (DFS), and 0.73 (DSS) in the development cohort, and 0.74, 0.71, and 0.76 in the validation cohort, all outperforming the NPS-based model. Calibration and decision curve analyses confirmed the model's robustness and clinical utility.
Conclusion:
Through OSCC-specific threshold recalibration, mNPS demonstrated improved prognostic discrimination compared with conventional indices. Incorporating mNPS into a nomogram enhances individualized risk stratification and provides a practical tool for guiding clinical decision-making in OSCC.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management