Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

High-Resolution Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Small Animals
Published on: December 16, 2022
Automated coronary analysis in ultrahigh-spatial resolution photon-counting detector CT angiography: Clinical
Dmitrij Kravchenko1, Muhammad Taha Hagar2, Akos Varga-Szemes3
1Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, SC, USA; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Quantitative Imaging Laboratory Bonn (QILaB), Bonn, Germany.
Objectives:
To evaluate a deep-learning algorithm for automated coronary artery analysis on ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography and compared its performance to expert readers using invasive coronary angiography as reference.
Methods:
Thirty-two patients (mean age 68.6 years; 81 % male) underwent both energy-integrating detector and ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector CT within 30 days. Expert readers scored each image using the Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System classification, and compared to invasive angiography. After a three-month wash-out, one reader reanalyzed the photon-counting detector CT images assisted by the algorithm. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, inter-reader agreement, and reading times were recorded for each method.
Results:
On 401 arterial segments, inter-reader agreement improved from substantial (κ = 0.75) on energy-integrating detector CT to near-perfect (κ = 0.86) on photon-counting detector CT. The algorithm alone achieved 85 % sensitivity, 91 % specificity, and 90 % accuracy on energy-integrating detector CT, and 85 %, 96 %, and 95 % on photon-counting detector CT. Compared to invasive angiography on photon-counting detector CT, manual and automated reads had similar sensitivity (67 %), but manual assessment slightly outperformed regarding specificity (85 % vs. 79 %) and accuracy (84 % vs. 78 %). When the reader was assisted by the algorithm, specificity rose to 97 % (p < 0.001), accuracy to 95 %, and reading time decreased by 54 % (p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
This deep-learning algorithm demonstrates high agreement with experts and improved diagnostic performance on photon-counting detector CT. Expert review augmented by the algorithm further increases specificity and dramatically reduces interpretation time.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...

