Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Purpose of Health Records I01:11

Purpose of Health Records I

1.3K
The vital purpose of health records is to provide a complete and accurate account of a patient's medical history, including communication, diagnostic and therapeutic orders, care planning, research, and quality review.
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
1.3K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

5.3K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
5.3K
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System01:30

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

915
Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
915
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.0K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.0K
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

198
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
198
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

174
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
174

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Missed opportunities for antibiotic de-escalation among clinically stable adult patients with bloodstream infection: secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter study.

International journal of antimicrobial agents·2026
Same author

Identification of risk factors for hospital-onset bacteremia to inform a routine data based risk prediction - an umbrella review.

The Journal of hospital infection·2026
Same author

Correction: How pain intensity and mental disorders shape chronic pain sick leave and quality of life in the general Spanish population.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

An externally validated machine learning algorithm for predicting mental and physical health outcomes three months post-hospitalization for severe viral infection with SARS-CoV-2.

Brain, behavior, & immunity - health·2026
Same author

Autoantibodies to IL-1Ra and PGRN in severe COVID-19 are associated with inflammation-induced hyperphosphorylated antigen isoforms.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Meet NUM-ENRICH: A Collaborative National Effort to Extend and Harmonize Research Infrastructures Within the German Network University Medicine.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Executing Complexity-Increasing Queries in Relational MySQL and NoSQL MongoDB and EXist Size-Growing ISO/EN 13606 Standardized EHR Databases
07:26

Executing Complexity-Increasing Queries in Relational MySQL and NoSQL MongoDB and EXist Size-Growing ISO/EN 13606 Standardized EHR Databases

Published on: March 19, 2018

9.4K

Performance of Contradiction Rule Implementations in Health Data for Efficient Data Quality Assessments.

Khalid O Yusuf1, Irina Chaplinskaya-Sobol1, Anne Schoneberg1

  • 1Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany.

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
|September 3, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Optimizing data quality assessment (DQA) for cardiovascular disease data involves balancing rule implementation speed and detail. A combined approach using raw and atomic Boolean rules enhances DQA efficiency and traceability.

Keywords:
Data qualitycontradiction ruleshealth dataincremental processing

More Related Videos

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.2K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Executing Complexity-Increasing Queries in Relational MySQL and NoSQL MongoDB and EXist Size-Growing ISO/EN 13606 Standardized EHR Databases
07:26

Executing Complexity-Increasing Queries in Relational MySQL and NoSQL MongoDB and EXist Size-Growing ISO/EN 13606 Standardized EHR Databases

Published on: March 19, 2018

9.4K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.2K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Data Quality Management
  • Cardiovascular Disease Research

Background:

  • Boolean rules are fundamental for data quality assessment (DQA) in health research.
  • Contradiction rules, crucial for DQA, face performance challenges as they scale.
  • Existing DQA rule implementations require optimization for efficiency and detail.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate varied data quality assessment rule implementations for cardiovascular disease data.
  • To propose an optimized method integrating strengths of different rule approaches.
  • To address performance degradation in rule-based DQA systems.

Main Methods:

  • Implemented three Boolean rule types: raw domain rule-set, minimal Boolean rules, and atomic Boolean rules.
  • Assessed execution speed and memory utilization on a cardiovascular disease dataset (COVID-19 cohort).
  • Utilized a two-step approach to integrate fastest and atomic contradiction rule implementations.

Main Results:

  • Raw domain rule-set was over 100x faster than atomic rules; minimal rules were 9x faster.
  • Atomic rules offer detailed, traceable results essential for contradiction inspection.
  • A two-step approach significantly reduced the speed gap between raw and atomic rules.

Conclusions:

  • Atomic rules provide necessary detail and traceability for DQA.
  • A combined processing strategy balances speed and detail in DQA.
  • Optimized DQA methods enable fast yet thorough data quality checks for cardiovascular disease.