Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Computed Tomography01:10

Computed Tomography

7.6K
Tomography refers to imaging by sections. Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses computers to analyze several cross-sectional X-rays to reveal minute details about structures in the body.
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
7.6K
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography01:27

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

893
DefinitionComputed Tomography (CT) of the genitourinary (GU) tract is a non-invasive imaging modality that utilizes X-rays and computer processing to generate detailed cross-sectional images of the urinary system, encompassing the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and adjacent structures such as the adrenal glands.PurposeCT scans of the GU tract serve several diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, including:Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Diseases: Detects kidney stones, tumors, cysts, and congenital...
893

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Meet NUM-ENRICH: A Collaborative National Effort to Extend and Harmonize Research Infrastructures Within the German Network University Medicine.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Make Open Source Compliant: Validation in Non-Interventional Clinical Studies.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

The Somnolink-Hub: A Central Infrastructure That Unites Sleep Data at Point of Care.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Participatory Technology Assessment in AI Development for Sleep Medicine.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Utilizing Routine Care Data of Rare Diseases: Challenges, Chances and Call for Collaboration.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Assessing the Compliance of Nursing Data in a Rehabilitation Portal with the German ePatient Record (ePA) Standard for Nursing Discharges.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

15.9K

An Open Data and Methods Framework for Comparative Evaluation of DICOM De-Identification Tools.

Friederike Seyderhelm1, James Bowden1, Philip Zaschke1

  • 1University Medical Center Göttingen, Dpt. of Medical Informatics, Germany.

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
|September 3, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Comparing Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) de-identification tools is crucial for protecting patient privacy. A structured workflow helps evaluate tools like Clinical Trials Processor (CTP) and RSNA Anonymizer (RDA), revealing key differences for specific use cases.

Keywords:
Clinical StudyDICOMData ProtectionDe-identificationMedical Imaging

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

987
Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions
06:18

Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions

Published on: April 5, 2024

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

15.9K
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

987
Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions
06:18

Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions

Published on: April 5, 2024

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging Informatics
  • Data Privacy and Security
  • Radiology Research

Background:

  • Patient privacy and data confidentiality are paramount in clinical studies, necessitating robust de-identification of sensitive medical imaging data.
  • The Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) standard, with over 5,000 metadata tags, presents significant challenges for de-identification, including private tags and image-based identifiers.
  • Existing de-identification tools require systematic evaluation to ensure effective removal of identifying information from complex DICOM objects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define a standardized workflow for the comparative evaluation of DICOM de-identification tools.
  • To assess the performance and functionality of different de-identification software based on defined requirements and indicators.
  • To provide guidance for selecting appropriate de-identification tools based on specific use case needs.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed requirements and performance indicators for DICOM de-identification tools.
  • Utilized open data and open-source tools for a comparable assessment of de-identification capabilities.
  • Applied the evaluation workflow to the Clinical Trials Processor (CTP) and the RSNA Anonymizer (RDA) tools.

Main Results:

  • The developed workflow effectively facilitated systematic comparison of de-identification tools, highlighting functional and use-case specific differences.
  • Both CTP and RDA demonstrated effectiveness in removing identifying information from DICOM datasets.
  • Distinct differences were observed in the approaches and DICOM standard compliance between CTP and RDA.

Conclusions:

  • A structured comparison using open data and methods reveals significant differences in the functionality and practical suitability of DICOM de-identification tools.
  • The choice of de-identification tool must be tailored to specific use cases, considering the complexities of DICOM metadata and image-based identifiers.
  • Ongoing challenges in de-identification underscore the need for continued development and rigorous evaluation of these essential tools.