Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

13.1K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
13.1K
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

13.2K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
13.2K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.3K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.3K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

4.9K
Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
4.9K
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules02:35

Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules

54.5K
Noncovalent attractions are associations within and between molecules that influence the shape and structural stability of complexes. These interactions differ from covalent bonding in that they do not involve sharing of electrons.
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
54.5K
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins02:18

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

18.1K
Intrinsically disordered proteins are a group of proteins that do not fold into specific three-dimensional structures. Their structural flexibility allows them to complement ordered proteins to perform functions that are inaccessible to rigid structures. They are more common in eukaryotes than prokaryotes and may either be exclusively intrinsically disordered or hybrid proteins, consisting of a mix of ordered and disordered regions. The absence of a rigid structure in these proteins can be...
18.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical Key Features Uncovered by Blood Eosinophilia-Based Machine Learning Classification of Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

International forum of allergy & rhinology·2025
Same author

Re: Letter to the Editor Regarding "Uncovering Key Features for Predicting Comorbid Chronic Eosinophilic Pneumonia in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Via Machine Learning".

International forum of allergy & rhinology·2025
Same author

Uncovering Key Features for Predicting Comorbid Chronic Eosinophilic Pneumonia in Chronic Rhinosinusitis via Machine Learning.

International forum of allergy & rhinology·2025
Same author

The interictal transcriptomic map of migraine without aura.

The journal of headache and pain·2025
Same author

A multilineage screen identifies actionable synthetic lethal interactions in human cancers.

Nature genetics·2024
Same author

Switching biologics in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A multicenter Canadian experience.

International forum of allergy & rhinology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

521

Beyond rigid docking: deep learning approaches for fully flexible protein-ligand interactions.

John Lee1, Canh Hao Nguyen1, Hiroshi Mamitsuka1

  • 1Bioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji 611-0011, Japan.

Briefings in Bioinformatics
|September 3, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Deep learning (DL) revolutionizes molecular docking for drug discovery, offering faster and more accurate predictions. New models address limitations by incorporating protein flexibility for realistic biomolecular interaction analysis.

Keywords:
co-foldingdiffusion modelsflexible dockingmolecular dockingprotein–ligand interaction

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.9K
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

521
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.9K
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Biophysics
  • Drug discovery

Background:

  • Molecular docking predicts protein-ligand interactions, crucial for drug discovery.
  • Traditional methods are computationally intensive, often sacrificing accuracy for speed in virtual screening.
  • Deep learning (DL) models show promise in enhancing molecular docking accuracy and efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the impact of DL on molecular docking.
  • To examine current challenges and emerging solutions in DL-based docking.
  • To explore future directions for improving computational predictions of biomolecular interactions.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent advancements in DL for molecular docking.
  • Analysis of DL model performance compared to traditional docking algorithms.
  • Exploration of techniques incorporating protein flexibility into DL docking models.

Main Results:

  • DL significantly reduces computational costs while maintaining or improving docking accuracy.
  • DL models face challenges in generalization and predicting accurate molecular properties (stereochemistry, bond lengths).
  • Incorporating protein flexibility into DL models shows potential for more realistic biomolecular interaction predictions.

Conclusions:

  • DL has transformed molecular docking, offering a powerful alternative to traditional methods.
  • Addressing DL model limitations, such as generalization and physical realism, is crucial.
  • Future research focusing on protein flexibility and advanced DL architectures will further enhance drug discovery pipelines.