Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
Published on: June 20, 2025
Beyond rigid docking: deep learning approaches for fully flexible protein-ligand interactions
John Lee1, Canh Hao Nguyen1, Hiroshi Mamitsuka1
1Bioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji 611-0011, Japan.
Abstract:
Sparked by AlphaFold2's groundbreaking success in protein structure prediction, recent years have seen a surge of interest in developing deep learning (DL) models for molecular docking. Molecular docking is a computational approach for predicting how proteins interact with small molecules known as ligands. It has become an essential tool in drug discovery, enabling structure-based virtual screening (VS) methods to efficiently explore vast libraries of drug-like molecules and identify potential therapeutic candidates. However, traditional docking methods primarily rely on search-and-score algorithms, which are computationally demanding. To be viable for VS applications, these methods often sacrifice accuracy for speed by simplifying their search algorithms and scoring functions. Recent advancements in DL have transformed molecular docking, offering accuracy that rivals-or even surpasses-traditional approaches while significantly reducing computational costs. Despite these advancements, DL-based molecular docking still faces major challenges. DL models often struggle to generalize beyond their training data and frequently mispredict key molecular properties, such as stereochemistry, bond lengths, and steric interactions, leading to physically unrealistic predictions. To overcome these limitations, a new generation of models is using DL to incorporate protein flexibility into docking predictions, aiming to more accurately capture the dynamic nature of biomolecular interactions-a long-standing challenge for traditional methods. This review explores how DL has reshaped molecular docking, examines its current shortcomings, and highlights emerging solutions. Finally, we discuss future opportunities to further bridge the gap between computational predictions and real-world molecular interactions.
More Related Videos
10:21Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
Published on: February 23, 2024
06:50Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
Published on: January 26, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Protein-protein Interfaces
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Ligand Binding and Linkage
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins