Time-Dependent Changes in Resorbable Implants for Orbital Wall Fractures: Evaluation Using Orbital Volume
Yuki Hasegawa1, Ken Masamune1, Yosuke Niimi2
1Institute of Advanced Biomedical Engineering and Science, Tokyo Women's Medical University.
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
|September 4, 2025
Summary
Resorbable implants for orbital fractures show varied long-term effects. Uncalcined hydroxyapatite/poly-L-lactic acid (u-HA/PLLA) offers stable orbital volume, unlike poly-L-lactic acid/polyglycolic acid (PLLA/PGA) which may regress.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Craniofacial Surgery
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Resorbable implants are utilized for orbital wall fracture repair, offering temporary support.
- Long-term effects of implant resorption on orbital morphology remain incompletely understood.
- Evaluating different resorbable materials is crucial for predicting post-surgical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the long-term volumetric changes of orbital reconstructions using two distinct resorbable plate types.
- To assess the stability of orbital morphology following repair with uncalcined hydroxyapatite/poly-L-lactic acid (u-HA/PLLA) versus poly-L-lactic acid/polyglycolic acid (PLLA/PGA) implants.
- To investigate the correlation between orbital volume changes and enophthalmos.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 30 patients with fresh orbital wall fractures.
- Computed tomography (CT) scans were used for orbital volume measurements at preoperative, early postoperative, and late postoperative (≥4 months) time points.
- Mimics software calculated orbital volumes; ocular protrusion assessed enophthalmos.
Main Results:
- The u-HA/PLLA group demonstrated stable orbital volumes post-surgery (mean difference decreased from 2.30 cm³ to 1.10 cm³ and remained at 1.17 cm³).
- The PLLA/PGA group showed initial improvement followed by significant volumetric regression during follow-up.
- A significant correlation (P=0.004, R²=0.260) was found between orbital volume differences and enophthalmos.
Conclusions:
- PLLA/PGA implants may lead to orbital morphologic regression over time.
- u-HA/PLLA implants provide more stable long-term orbital volume maintenance.
- Implant selection for orbital reconstruction should prioritize long-term mechanical integrity for sustained clinical success.


