Dysregulation of chromatin remodeling genes predicts clinical outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Investigation of the Transcriptional Role of a RUNX1 Intronic Silencer by CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells
Published on: September 1, 2019
Lanxiang Liu1, Li Wang1, Hongbin Zhang1
1Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, PR China.
Background:
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignancy of the blood system. The commonly altered regions in the genome of AML encompass a multitude of gene modifications associated with epigenetic regulation. However, the prognostic significance of chromatin remodeling-related genes (CRRGs) as an overall indicator has yet to be assessed in AML.
Methods:
Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed for CRRGs. Following unsupervised clustering analysis, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and immune cells between chromatin remodeling related subtypes in TCGA-AML were measured. Univariate Cox analysis and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) analysis were used to screen prognostic biomarkers for AML, and a risk model was subsequently constructed. Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) analysis and tumor mutation burden (TMB) analysis was conducted in different risk groups. Using Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) score to assess patients' differences in sensitivity to immunotherapy. Additionally, the construction and verification of the nomogram were carried out. The expression of biomarkers in healthy and AML patients was analyzed by Quantitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR).
Results:
A total of 106 prognostic CRRGs were identified. Between the two clusters, 3995 genes, activated CD4 memory T cells and activated Dendritic cells were differentially expressed. A total of 6 prognostic biomarkers were identified (ARF6, ASF1B, CHD5, FLNA, KDM5B, and SPI1I), and a risk model was generated based on these biomarkers. The high-risk group exhibited higher TIDE scores. Moreover, 29 drugs showed lower IC50 values in high-risk group. We also found that risk score was an independent prognostic factor for AML. RT-qPCR results showed significant differences in expression of ARF6, KDM5B and CHD5 between healthy and AML patients.
Conclusion:
We identified six biomarkers, namely ARF6, ASF1B, CHD5, FLNA, KDM5B, and SPI1, thereby establishing a theoretical foundation for clinical diagnosis of AML.
More Related Videos
13:21Comprehensive DNA Methylation Analysis Using a Methyl-CpG-binding Domain Capture-based Method in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients
Published on: June 16, 2017
09:52A Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assay to Identify Novel NFAT2 Target Genes in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Published on: December 4, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Nucleosome Remodeling
Nucleosome remodeling complex
Eukaryotic cells have specialized enzymes called ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling enzymes. These enzymes...
Chromatin Modification in iPS Cells
Compact chromatin makes reprogramming difficult. Enzymes, such as histone demethylases and acetyltransferases, are often added during reprogramming to loosen the chromatin, making the DNA more accessible to transcription factors. Molecules that inhibit histone...
Spreading of Chromatin Modifications
Writers
The writer...
Epigenetic Regulation
X-chromosome...
Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression
Topologically Associated Domains (TADs)
The 3-dimensional positioning of chromatin in the nucleus influences the...
Chromatin Structure Regulates pre-mRNA Processing
The chromatin structure, especially...