Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
Published on: January 7, 2019
Interpersonal and intrapersonal leadership competencies: an interpretative phenomenological analysis on effective
Marion Koreen Andrea Aquino1, Alicia Mae Bumacod1, Arizzandra Gerriz Calapine1
1People Dynamics, Inc., Pasig, Philippines.
Introduction:
In today's dynamic business environment, unforeseen challenges have become increasingly prevalent as markets evolve. Effective leadership is critical to organizational success, requiring leaders who can efficiently manage both their tasks and employees. Thus, it is valuable to explore and identify competencies possessed by competent leaders.
Methods:
The study utilized an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) approach to have a detailed exploration of the strategies and practices leaders find most effective in navigating complex organizational challenges, such as strategy adoption, teamwork improvement, client relationship management, ethical decision-making, and industry adaptation. Purposive sampling was used to select five Filipino organizational leaders from diverse industries. The small yet varied sample allowed for an in-depth analysis of personal experiences while ensuring that the findings resonate broadly within the Philippine organizational context. Data collection involved in-depth, semi-structured interviews conducted via Microsoft Teams. The interviews were transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed in accordance with IPA guidelines.
Results And Discussion:
Competencies were categorized under the five competency areas, with further exploration of interpersonal and intrapersonal impacts. The iterative analysis revealed recurring competencies across all areas. Intrapersonal competencies included personal growth through change, leadership through vision and resilience, continuous learning, innovative thinking and openness, and resilience in personal challenges. Meanwhile, interpersonal competencies included collective innovation, effective communication, transformative client engagement, empathetic conflict resolution, and building adaptive teams. These enabled leaders to maintain their competence in navigating organizational challenges, including the pandemic, technological advancements, and evolving workforce dynamics. These findings suggest that effective leadership operates on both individual and interpersonal levels. Leaders' internal processes significantly influence their relationships and interactions. Resilient leaders stabilize teams during crises, while a commitment to continuous learning fosters innovation and collaboration. Strong communication skills promote knowledge sharing and strengthen relationships with clients, subordinates, and stakeholders. Empathetic leadership reduces stress and conflict, creating healthier work environments. Finally, leaders' motivation and dedication inspire team transformation and adaptability. Thus, these leadership competencies are instrumental in sustaining a competitive edge and driving organizational growth amidst a dynamic business environment.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Carl Rogers' Humanistic Perspective on Personality
The organism refers to an individual's inherent blueprint, which Rogers saw as innately positive and directed toward helping others, unlike Freud's view of the id as driven by base impulses. The self is a person's...
Elements Crucial for Effective Psychotherapy
The Therapeutic Alliance
The therapeutic alliance refers to the relationship between the therapist and the client. The alliance strengthens when the therapist and the client engage in a nurturing, supportive, trusting, empathetic, and respectful relationship, improving therapeutic outcomes. Therapists must monitor this relationship...
Multiple Intelligences Theory
Levels of Communication I: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Small Group
We can participate in these relationships through verbal, nonverbal, and mediated communication. We engage in verbal communication when we use words during our interaction to convey specific meanings. On the other hand, nonverbal communication refers to various factors that can impact how we understand each other—for example, facial expressions.
We interact with others using mediated technologies like the...
Intelligence

