Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Patterns of the assessment in intellectual disability for unique disability identity (UDID): A two-year study
Ram Pratap Beniwal1, Sonali Dixit2, Shashank Tripathi3
1Department of Psychiatry, Centre of Excellence in Mental Health, ABVIMS and Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Background:
Intellectual Disability poses the significant public health challenge and stigma. Notably, there has been a steady increase over the past few years in the issuance of Unique Disability Identity (UDID) cards, which are specifically designated for individuals with disabilities.
Aim:
To examine socio-demographic patterns and clinical profiles of individuals certified with intellectual disability (ID) for UDID.
Methods:
This is a hospital-based cross-sectional study observed over 2 years at a tertiary care government hospital. Data from 960 applicants assessed for ID certification were chart reviewed. Diagnoses followed ICD-10 criteria, and standardized intelligence tests determined the level of ID.
Results:
Mean age was 17.5 years. Of the applicants, 2.3% had borderline intelligence, 37.2% mild ID, 36.04% moderate, 15.8% severe, and 8.4% profound. Males comprised 63.2%, females 36.7%. Only 1.77% were employed.
Conclusion:
The UDID initiative improves access to welfare and support services for individuals with ID, highlighting the need for ongoing policy and rehabilitation efforts.
Related Concept Videos
Intellectual Disability
Dissociative Identity Disorder
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.

