Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.2K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.2K
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

650
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
650
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

409
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
409

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

The Prevention Gap: Cervical Cancer in Older Women.

Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health·2026
Same author

Correction: Understanding Physician Referral for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) Therapy.

Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education·2026
Same author

Understanding Physician Referral for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) Therapy.

Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education·2026
Same author

Colorectal cancer screening: An update to the American Cancer Society guideline, 2026.

CA: a cancer journal for clinicians·2026
Same author

Parents' Preferred Age (9-12) for HPV Vaccination: Decision-Making and Rationale.

Vaccines·2026
Same author

Factors associated with intention to obtain HPV vaccination at ages 9-10 among parents with varied prior vaccine decision making experiences and choices.

Vaccine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 18, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.8K

Factors Associated With Guideline-Concordant Cervical Cancer Screening Exit: A Mixed Methods Study.

Abigael Olson1, Lindsay Fuzzell2, Naomi C Brownstein3

  • 1Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Women'S Health Issues : Official Publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women'S Health
|September 9, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Many clinicians lack knowledge of cervical cancer screening exit criteria, leading to inadequate screening in older women. Simplifying guidelines is recommended to improve adherence and patient care.

More Related Videos

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

648

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 18, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.8K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

648

Area of Science:

  • Gynecology
  • Public Health
  • Preventive Medicine

Background:

  • Over 20% of cervical cancers occur in women over 65.
  • Current guidelines recommend screening cessation at 65 for average-risk individuals meeting specific criteria.
  • Many women aged 64-66 in the US are not screened according to guidelines.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore clinician knowledge of cervical cancer screening exit criteria.
  • To identify factors, facilitators, and barriers related to guideline-concordant screening cessation.

Main Methods:

  • A mixed-methods study involving national surveys (n=1,251) and qualitative interviews (n=55) of clinicians.
  • Guideline concordance was defined by awareness of hysterectomy, Pap test, and HPV test criteria, and exclusion of those with prior precancer treatment.

Main Results:

  • Only 35% of clinicians correctly identified all screening exit criteria.
  • Awareness was higher for hysterectomy ( >70%) and prior negative screening ( >70%) criteria.
  • Factors associated with correct responses included male gender, OB/GYN specialty, and academic/hospital practice settings.

Conclusions:

  • Clinicians exhibit knowledge gaps and practical difficulties in applying cervical cancer screening exit criteria.
  • Increasing life expectancy and decreasing hysterectomy rates will increase the number of older women at risk.
  • Simplifying exit criteria may improve adherence and reduce screening disparities.