Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device01:30

Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device

383
Surveyors use Global Positioning System (GPS) technology to measure the precise location and elevation of points on Earth. In a recent survey, GPS receivers were used to determine the coordinates and elevations of two park monuments. The process involved careful mission planning, data collection, and correction to ensure accuracy. The survey began with mission planning to identify optimal satellite visibility and minimize Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP). A geodetic control point...
383
Trapezoidal Rule01:26

Trapezoidal Rule

20
Estimating the distance traveled by a vehicle using its recorded velocity over time is a common problem in physics and engineering. When velocity data is available at discrete time intervals, rather than as a continuous function, numerical integration methods such as the trapezoidal rule are often employed to approximate the total displacement.The trapezoidal rule works by dividing the total time interval into several equal segments. Within each segment, the recorded velocities at the endpoints...
20
Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

341
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
341
Schemas01:42

Schemas

12.3K
A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
12.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A systems-level atlas of carbon-response transcriptional states in <i>Escherichia coli</i>.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Non-interruptive decision support to increase appropriate screening for primary hyperparathyroidism.

American journal of surgery·2026
Same author

Understanding Concussion Knowledge in Urban Community Settings: Perspectives of School Nurses and Youth Athletic Program Leaders.

The Journal of school nursing : the official publication of the National Association of School Nurses·2026
Same author

Behaviorally informed electronic health record decision support to reduce urine drug testing and testing disparities at birth: a quality improvement study.

American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM·2026
Same author

The Spiked Helmet Sign: When ST-Segment Elevations Do Not Need the Cath Lab.

JACC. Case reports·2026
Same author

A Dose of Delay: Emergency Department Boarding and Early Clinical Deterioration.

Annals of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Exploring the relationship between traffic, speed, and personal in-vehicle noise exposure during commutes.

Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives·2026
Same journal

Funding for public transportation: results from a Midwest exit poll.

Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives·2026
Same journal

Impact of 4-to-3 Lane Conversions on Emergency Response.

Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives·2024
Same journal

Who shouts the loudest? A qualitative study exploring barriers and enablers to implementing a low emission zone in a Northern UK city.

Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives·2024
Same journal

Strategy and safety at stop intersections in older adults with mild cognitive impairment and visual decline.

Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives·2024
Same journal

Is the 15-minute city within reach? Evaluating walking and cycling accessibility to grocery stores in Vancouver.

Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives·2023
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

9.3K

Validation of a smartphone telematics algorithm for classifying driver trips.

Jeffrey P Ebert1,2, Ruiying A Xiong1,2, Arjun Patel1,2

  • 1Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania .

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
|September 10, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study found that a smartphone telematics algorithm accurately distinguishes driver from non-driver trips. The algorithm achieved high overall accuracy, demonstrating its potential for usage-based auto insurance applications.

Keywords:
Driver classification algorithmaccuracydriver risk scoremobile telematics applicationnaturalistic studyusage-based insurance

More Related Videos

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study
07:51

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study

Published on: March 14, 2017

17.2K
Trajectory Data Analyses for Pedestrian Space-time Activity Study
16:14

Trajectory Data Analyses for Pedestrian Space-time Activity Study

Published on: February 25, 2013

14.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

9.3K
Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study
07:51

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study

Published on: March 14, 2017

17.2K
Trajectory Data Analyses for Pedestrian Space-time Activity Study
16:14

Trajectory Data Analyses for Pedestrian Space-time Activity Study

Published on: February 25, 2013

14.1K

Area of Science:

  • * Mobile Sensing and Telematics
  • * Transportation Safety and Insurance Technology

Background:

  • * Accurate classification of vehicle trips as driver or non-driver is crucial for telematics applications, particularly in usage-based auto insurance.
  • * Existing telematics algorithms rely on smartphone data to infer driving behavior, but their accuracy needs continuous assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To evaluate the accuracy of a smartphone telematics algorithm in classifying car trips as either driver or non-driver.
  • * To assess the algorithm's performance across various trip types and user contexts.

Main Methods:

  • * A 4-week study using the 'Way to Drive' research telematics application, mirroring algorithms used by major auto insurers.
  • * Participants reviewed and self-reported misclassified trips weekly via an in-app survey.
  • * Analysis focused on overall accuracy, sensitivity (driver trip classification), and specificity (non-driver trip classification).

Main Results:

  • * High overall accuracy (96.5%) in distinguishing driver from non-driver trips.
  • * Excellent sensitivity (97.5%) for correctly identifying driver trips.
  • * Slightly lower but acceptable specificity (91.2%) for non-driver trips, with notable variability.

Conclusions:

  • * The smartphone telematics algorithm demonstrates high accuracy for driver vs. non-driver trip classification.
  • * The algorithm's performance is robust across diverse phone, vehicle, and driving conditions.
  • * This technology shows significant promise for accurate data collection in telematics and auto insurance contexts.