Assessment of different preservation techniques for human skeletal muscle biopsy samples: A comparative method study

Sebastian Edman1,2, Alice Engvall1, Tuva Eriksson Viklund1

  • 1Department of Physiology, Nutrition and Biomechanics, Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.

Physiological Reports
|September 10, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Choosing the right skeletal muscle preservation method is crucial for accurate biochemical analysis. RNAlater and RNAlater-ICE significantly alter protein and amino acid levels compared to freeze-drying.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Muscle Physiology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Human skeletal muscle has slow-twitch (Type I) and fast-twitch (Type II) fibers.
  • Accurate fiber type-specific analysis requires effective tissue preservation.
  • Freeze-drying is standard, but RNAlater and RNAlater-ICE are alternatives for RNA preservation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate RNAlater and RNAlater-ICE for downstream biochemical analyses in skeletal muscle.
  • To compare these methods against freeze-drying for protein, amino acid, and enzyme activity preservation.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of freeze-drying with RNAlater and three RNAlater-ICE protocols.
  • Analysis of protein content, amino acid levels, and enzyme activity (citrate synthase).

Main Results:

  • RNAlater and RNAlater-ICE caused significant alterations in protein content, amino acid levels, and enzyme activity.
  • Citrate synthase activity was abolished by all RNAlater-ICE protocols.
  • Branched-chain amino acid levels were reduced in RNAlater and RNAlater-ICE samples.
  • Total protein concentration was lower with RNAlater-ICE compared to freeze-drying and RNAlater.

Conclusions:

  • Preservation method choice critically impacts skeletal muscle biochemical analysis.
  • Caution is advised when using RNAlater and RNAlater-ICE for protein or amino acid studies.
  • Freeze-drying remains a more reliable method for comprehensive biochemical preservation.