Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Health systems responsiveness in low and middle-income countries (L&MICs): revisiting its scope
Meesha Iqbal1, Robert Morgan2, Cici Bauer3
1Department of Management Policy and Community Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA meesha_jazz@hotmail.com.
Introduction:
Health systems responsiveness (HSR) addresses the legitimate non-health expectations of the population and plays a vital role in strengthening health systems and enhancing population health. Identifying specific constructs or domains within HSR is particularly important in the context of low and middle-income countries (L&MICs) to facilitate targeted improvement. Following a comprehensive systematic review of the literature, we developed a conceptual framework for HSR. This study was designed to validate our proposed framework through a Delphi process.
Methods:
Global HSR experts were contacted via email to participate in the study, and a copy of the proposed framework (12 domains, 53 subdomains) was shared with them. Participants were asked to rate each subdomain on a scale of 1-5, with 5 being the highest score; based on scientific strength, relevance and feasibility. They also provided suggestions to merge, omit or add domains and subdomains. A subdomain was retained if it received a rating of 4 or 5 from at least 70% of participants for scientific strength and relevance, and 50% or more for feasibility. The final version of the framework was shared with all participants for approval.
Results:
Thirteen global health experts participated in the Delphi process. Final version of the HSR framework consisted of 10 domains: respect for dignity, autonomy and confidentiality of information; quality of basic amenities; access to social support networks during care; choice of provider; prompt access to care; attention, clarity of communication and guidance; consideration of financial protection; coordination and continuity of care and 31 subdomains. The overall Cronbach's alpha values were 0.94, 0.93 and 0.96 for the categories of scientific strength, relevance and feasibility of assessment, respectively, indicating very high internal consistency among the Delphi participants.
Conclusion:
We recommend using this framework to elaborate on HSR across L&MICs, after pretesting within specific contexts.
More Related Videos
06:28Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
19:57An Affordable HIV-1 Drug Resistance Monitoring Method for Resource Limited Settings
Published on: March 30, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Secondary Healthcare System
Traditional Level Of Health Care System
The preventive healthcare service includes tests for screening. Preventive health care services include identifying and reducing disease risk...