Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Do billing codes accurately reflect pediatric emergency physician workload? A cross-sectional study
Erica Qureshi1,2, Kenneth McKinley3, Justin Park4,5
1Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. erica.mcdonald@bcchr.ca.
Background:
Measuring physician workload in the pediatric emergency department (ED) could help optimize staffing, improve department efficiency, and provide a metric to assess interventions aimed at improving pediatric ED flow. However, no accepted measure of physician workload exists. Billing codes, which reflect the perceived complexity of treating a patient, may serve as a surrogate for physician workload. Our objective was to evaluate whether billing codes are a valid surrogate for pediatric ED physician workload.
Methods:
We conducted a health records review to determine if billing codes were associated with measures of pediatric ED physician work. Visit information was extracted for 150 pediatric ED visits. We used multivariable ordinal logistic regression models to assess the association between pediatric ED physician-assigned billing codes, with measures of visit complexity, and measures of pediatric ED physician work. We also completed a sensitivity analysis considering a billing auditors-assigned billing codes.
Results:
Three measures of pediatric ED physician work were independently associated with increased physician-assigned billing codes: receiving labs (OR 5.6, 95% CI 2.2-15.4), ordering medications (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-5.1), and having specialist consultation (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.6-12.5). We did not find any statistically significant associations between physician-assigned billing codes and measures of physician work after adjusting for visit complexity, age, and sex. Visit acuity (PaedsCTAS 1-3) was associated with increased billing codes (aOR 5.1 95% CI 1.9-15.7). These results were largely consistent with our sensitivity analysis considering billing auditor-assigned codes.
Conclusions:
Overall, we found limited evidence supporting the content validity of billing code as a surrogate of pediatric ED physician workload. These results, coupled with the potential value of tracking physician workload, highlight the necessity to develop a valid and reliable measure specifically considering pediatric ED physician workload.
More Related Videos
11:27A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children