Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

04:16
Whole Body Vibration Methods with Survivors of Polio
Published on: October 17, 2018
9.2K
Immediate effects of localized vibration on flexibility: A randomized crossover trial
Ryota Matsuoka1, Yu Kobayashi1, Takayuki Otokuni1
1Department of Medical Technology, School of Health Sciences, Gifu University of Medical Science, Seki, Gifu, Japan.
Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
|September 16, 2025
Summary
Localized vibration (LV) may improve muscle flexibility more effectively than static stretching (SS). This study used muscle ultrasound (MUS) to assess lower limb flexibility, finding LV superior to SS.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics and Exercise Physiology
- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Imaging
Background:
- Localized vibration (LV) is a potential method to enhance flexibility, but its efficacy compared to conventional static stretching (SS) is not well-established.
- Understanding the immediate effects of LV on muscle properties is crucial for optimizing training protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the immediate effects of short-duration LV and SS on lower limb flexibility in healthy individuals.
- To utilize advanced muscle ultrasound (MUS) techniques, including three-dimensional shear wave elastography (3D-SWE) and Doppler MUS, for objective assessment.
Main Methods:
- A randomized crossover trial with a same-subject design involving 14 healthy participants.
- Interventions included 1 minute of LV (30 Hz, 3 mm amplitude) or SS applied to bilateral crural muscles.
- Muscle elasticity and blood flow were assessed using 3D-SWE and Doppler MUS, alongside a stand-and-reach test.
Main Results:
- Both LV and SS reduced flexibility, but LV resulted in a significantly smaller decrease compared to SS.
- LV significantly increased the power Doppler index (PDI) and decreased shear wave elastography (SWE) values in the gastrocnemius muscle, indicating altered muscle elasticity.
Conclusions:
- Localized vibration may offer a more effective approach than static stretching for improving immediate lower limb flexibility.
- 3D-SWE and Doppler MUS are valuable tools for objectively assessing muscle condition and elasticity changes post-intervention.
Related Concept Videos
Muscle Stimulation Frequency
4.3K
The contraction strength of muscles is regulated by motor neurons, which modulate the frequency of action potentials dispatched to the motor units based on the body's requirements. This process of varying the muscle stimulation frequency allows muscles to contract with a force that is precisely tailored to the needs of the moment, whether lifting a feather or a heavy box.
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
4.3K
Relaxation of Skeletal Muscles
5.5K
The period of muscle contraction primarily influences the duration of stimulation at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), the presence of free calcium ions in the sarcoplasm, and the availability of energy or ATP to support contractions.
When an action potential reaches the axon terminal, it depolarizes the membrane and opens voltage-gated sodium channels. Sodium ions enter the cell, further depolarizing the presynaptic membrane. This depolarization causes voltage-gated calcium channels to open....
When an action potential reaches the axon terminal, it depolarizes the membrane and opens voltage-gated sodium channels. Sodium ions enter the cell, further depolarizing the presynaptic membrane. This depolarization causes voltage-gated calcium channels to open....
5.5K

