Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Influence of Bone Condition and Implant Design on Accuracy of Semi-Autonomous Robotic Dental Implant Surgery In Vitro
Qingwei Tang1,2, Linhong Wang1, Yude Ding1
1Center for Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Stomatology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Objectives:
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of bone density, cortical bone thickness, and implant design on the accuracy of implant placement using a novel semi-autonomous robotic-assisted surgery system (sa-RASS).
Materials And Methods:
A total of 160 implants were placed in artificial bone models simulating four bone densities (D1, D2, D3, D4) and three cortical bone thicknesses (0.5, 1, 1.5 mm) using sa-RASS. Two implant designs (self-tapping and non-self-tapping) were evaluated under standardized cortical bone thickness conditions. The postoperative CBCT data and preoperative surgical plan were superimposed to calculate the deviations of the implant. Deviations were quantified for platform/apex positions (global, horizontal, vertical) and implant angulation.
Results:
The sa-RASS achieved mean deviations of 0.58 ± 0.19 mm at platform, 0.60 ± 0.24 mm at apex, and 1.46° ± 0.78° for angulation. Bone density significantly influenced accuracy (p < 0.05), with maximum deviations in medium-density (D2/D3) models and minimal errors in high-density (D1) and low-density (D4) groups. Cortical thickness exhibited a moderate positive correlation with linear deviations (platform: r = 0.598; apex: r = 0.593; both p < 0.001). Self-tapping implants demonstrated superior precision compared to non-self-tapping designs (p < 0.05), with reduced deviations at both platform (0.48 ± 0.16 mm) and apex (0.49 ± 0.16 mm).
Conclusions:
This in vitro study demonstrated that bone condition and implant design significantly influence the accuracy of sa-RASS. Understanding these factors can help optimize robotic-assisted implant placement and improve clinical outcomes.
Clinical Significance:
Bone condition and implant design significantly affect the accuracy of robotic-assisted implant placement. Preoperative assessment and proper implant selection can enhance precision and improve clinical outcomes.
More Related Videos
05:54Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
09:10Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
Published on: August 5, 2021