Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
Published on: February 6, 2020
Validation of the Brazilian Version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for
Lia Rodrigues Rocha1, Thalia Oliveira Ximenes2, Elidia Nascimento da Silva2
1Master Program in Physiotherapy and Functioning (PPGFisio), Physiotherapy Department, Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Brazil.
Background And Purpose:
The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) is a generic instrument created by the World Health Organization (WHO) for measuring functioning and disability. Although this instrument has been extensively studied in different populations, its validity concerning breast cancer patients who have undergone surgery remains uncharted. This study aims to analyze the measurement properties of the Brazilian version of WHODAS 2.0 to validate it as a tool for assessing the functioning/disability of postoperative breast cancer surgery patients.
Methods:
This is a validation study conducted at three centers in the northeast of Brazil, involving women between 3 and 12 months after mastectomy or quadrantectomy, interviewed with the Brazilian version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0. Participants also completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-B+4) questionnaire. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC) were used to measure test-retest reliability. Both construct and convergent validity were analyzed using Spearman correlation.
Results:
Ninety-five women with a mean age of 53.12 (± 11.10) answered the WHODAS. The responses revealed satisfactory internal consistency for all domains (α ≥ 0.7) and the total score (α = 0.93). Excellent test-retest reliability was observed (ICC = 0.87). Regarding the construct validity, a strong negative correlation was found between FACT-B+ 4 and WHODAS (ρ = -0.75). Moreover, the convergent validity analysis depicted correlations (between WHODAS and FACT-B+ 4 domains) ranging from weak to moderate, except for the "mobility" subscale of WHODAS, which showed a strong correlation with the "physical well-being" subscale of FACT-B+ 4.
Discussion:
The results provide evidence that the WHODAS 2.0 is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the functioning/disability of the target population, which allows its use as outcome measure based on the biopsychosocial model.
More Related Videos
03:07Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Published on: August 19, 2025
07:40Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
Published on: May 31, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I
There are thirteen domains...
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Disorders of the Female Reproductive System
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data...
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include: