Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Generation of a Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Model in Mice by Repeated Ozone Exposure
Published on: August 25, 2017
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Biologics in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Maria Gabriella Matera1, Luigino Calzetta2, Paola Rogliani3
1Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy.
Background:
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous condition with limited response to standard anti-inflammatory therapies. Biologics targeting specific inflammatory pathways have emerged as potential treatments, but their efficacy remains variable across distinct COPD endotypes.
Objective:
To systematically evaluate the efficacy and trial quality of biologics tested in COPD patients using a multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach, with attention to type 2 (T2) and non-T2 inflammatory targets.
Methods:
We assessed 20 trials encompassing 12 biologics and 9294 patients with COPD. Each trial was scored (0-3 per domain, total 12 points) across four domains: exacerbation reduction, lung function improvement, biomarker stratification, and trial design quality.
Results:
Dupilumab (anti-IL-4Rα) demonstrated the most robust efficacy in eosinophilic COPD, with consistent reductions in exacerbation rates and improvements in FEV1, supported by high trial quality. Mepolizumab and benralizumab (anti-IL-5/IL-5R) showed moderate efficacy in biomarker-enriched populations. Anti-alarmins, specifically tozorakimab (anti-IL-33), itepekimab (anti-IL-33/IL-1RL1), astegolimab (anti-ST2), and tezepelumab (anti-TSLP), showed mixed results, with modest lung function gains but largely non-significant effects on exacerbation rates. Agents targeting non-T2 pathways, including infliximab (anti-TNF-α), canakinumab (anti-IL-1β), MEDI8968 (anti-IL-1R1), CNTO6785 (anti-IL-17A), and ABX-IL8 (anti-IL-8), consistently failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy, often due to small sample sizes, early-phase design, and lack of biomarker stratification.
Conclusion:
Biologics targeting T2 inflammation offer therapeutic promise in eosinophilic COPD when guided by biomarkers. Conversely, current biologics directed at non-T2 and alarmin pathways yield limited or inconsistent benefits, emphasizing the need for improved phenotyping and targeted intervention strategies in non-eosinophilic COPD.
More Related Videos
06:22Machine Learning-Based Cough Tone Classification: Diagnostic Exploration of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Respiratory Tract Infections
Published on: September 19, 2025
07:35Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation
COPD: Management Using Bronchodilators and Corticosteroids
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Smoking is a primary risk factor for COPD, with over 80% of patients having a history of it. Patients typically experience progressive dyspnea or labored breathing, frequent coughing, and recurrent pulmonary infections. Many eventually succumb to respiratory failure, characterized by...