Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report
Published on: May 30, 2025
Impact of Motivational Interviewing Education on General Practitioners' and Trainees' Learning and Diabetes Outcomes
Isaraporn Thepwongsa1, Pat Nonjui1, Radhakrishnan Muthukumar2
1Department of Community, Family and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, 123, Mittraparb Road, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand, 66 43363588.
Background:
Effective diabetes management requires behavioral change support from primary care providers. However, general practitioners (GPs) often lack training in patient-centered communication methods such as motivational interviewing (MI), especially in time-constrained settings. While brief MI offers a practical alternative, evidence on its impact among GPs and patient outcomes remains limited.
Objective:
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured MI educational program for GPs and GP trainees on their MI knowledge and confidence, and its impact on clinical outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care settings.
Methods:
A mixed methods study was conducted using a before-and-after two-group design with quantitative assessments of GPs' knowledge and patients' biomarkers, supplemented by qualitative interviews. The intervention group (n=35) received a 4-hour interactive MI workshop, optional web-based modules, and brief MI guides. The control group received standard care. A total of 149 and 167 patients with diabetes were included in the study and control groups, respectively.
Results:
A paired-sample t test was conducted to evaluate the impact of the MI course on the learners' knowledge. There was a statistically significant difference in the knowledge test scores from Time 1 (mean 11.46, SD 3.48) to Time 2 (mean 15.04, SD 2.35), t28= -7.74; P<.001 (2-tailed). The mean increase in knowledge score was 3.57 (SD 2.44), with a 95% CI of 2.62 to 4.52, indicating a large and statistically significant effect. The eta-squared statistic indicated a large effect size (eta-squared=0.85). Patients in the intervention group had greater improvements in HbA1c (mean difference= -0.50, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.09; P=.02) and diastolic blood pressure (mean difference= -5.96 mmHg, 95% CI -8.66 to -3.25; P<.001) compared to controls. Qualitative feedback highlighted the usefulness of brief MI, along with challenges in mastering advanced techniques and time constraints.
Conclusions:
The MI educational program improved GP trainees' MI knowledge and patient outcomes. Brief MI appears feasible in primary care but requires ongoing support for skill development and implementation.
Related Concept Videos
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
