Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
Published on: January 7, 2019
People Evaluate Agents Based on the Algorithms That Drive Their Behavior
1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Abstract:
When people see an agent perform a task, do they care if the underlying algorithm driving it is 'intelligent' or not? More generally, when people intuitively evaluate the performance of others, do they value external performance metrics (intuitive behaviorism) or do they also take into account the underlying algorithm driving the agent's behavior (intuitive cognitivism)? We propose 3 dimensions for examining this distinction: Action Efficiency, Representation Efficiency, and Generalization. Across 3 tasks (N = 598), we showed people pairs of maze-solving agents, together with the programs driving the agents' behavior. Participants were asked to pick the 'better' of the two programs, based on a single example of the two programs, evaluated on the same maze. Each pair of programs varied along one of our 3 proposed dimensions. Our framework predicts people's choice of program across the tasks, and the results support the idea that people are intuitive cognitivists.
Related Concept Videos
The Representativeness Heuristic
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

