Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive medical imaging technique based on a phenomenon of nuclear physics discovered in the 1930s, in which matter exposed to magnetic fields and radio waves was found to emit radio signals. In 1970, a physician and researcher named Raymond Damadian noticed that malignant (cancerous) tissue gave off different signals than normal body tissue. He applied for a patent for the first MRI scanning device in clinical use by the early 1980s. The early MRI...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

From topography to connectome: Towards an integrated understanding of the resting brain.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Profiles of Aging Based on Cognition, Affect, and Brain Reserve.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Same author

Investigating Neural Correlates of Emotional Regulation as a Function of Age, Race, and Socioeconomic Status.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Same author

<i>Imaging Neuroscience</i> opening editorial.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025

Same author

Neurospectrum: A Geometric and Topological Deep Learning Framework for Uncovering Spatiotemporal Signatures in Neural Activity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Same author

Population modeling with machine learning can enhance measures of mental health - Open-data replication.

Neuroimage. Reports·2025

Same journal

MetaboNet-Bench: A Multi-modal Benchmark for Glucose Forecasting in Type 1 Diabetes.

ArXiv·2026

Same journal

A Positron Range Correction with Texture Preservation Framework in PET Imaging.

ArXiv·2026

Same journal

Automated optimization of force field parameters against ensemble-averaged measurements with Bayesian Inference of Conformational Populations.

ArXiv·2026

Same journal

Droplet Fusion as a Relaxation Process: Comparison with Shape Recovery of Newtonian and Viscoelastic Droplets.

ArXiv·2026

Same journal

Ridge-filter crosstalk in conformal proton FLASH planning: dependence on beamlet pitch and iterative mitigation.

ArXiv·2026

Same journal

Electrochemical DNA Hairpin Sensors for Differentiating Small Molecule Intercalation from Minor Groove Binding.

ArXiv·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms

Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms

Published on: March 21, 2019

Using topological data analysis to compare inter-subject variability across resting state functional MRI brain

Ty Easley^1,2, Kevin Freese^1,3,4,2, Elizabeth Munch^3,4

¹Mallinkrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in Saint Louis.

|September 18, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Choosing the right brain representation is crucial for reproducible resting-state functional MRI (rfMRI) studies. This research uses persistent homology to compare different representations, highlighting the impact of feature type on brain-behavior findings.

More Related Videos

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Probing the Brain in Autism Using fMRI and Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Probing the Brain in Autism Using fMRI and Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Published on: September 12, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms

Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms

Published on: March 21, 2019

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Probing the Brain in Autism Using fMRI and Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Probing the Brain in Autism Using fMRI and Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Published on: September 12, 2011

Area of Science:

Neuroimaging
Computational Neuroscience
Brain-Behavior Research

Background:

Resting-state functional MRI (rfMRI) data requires extensive post-processing to study brain-behavior associations.
Deriving brain representations involves dimension reduction and feature selection, leading to variability that hinders reproducibility.
Existing variability in brain representations complicates the integration and comparison of findings across studies.

Purpose of the Study:

To enable direct comparison of different rfMRI brain representations.
To investigate the impact of brain representation choice on individual differences.
To establish best practices for assessing replicability and generalizability in rfMRI brain-behavior research.

Main Methods:

Utilized persistent homology to analyze topologies of subject-space data.
Evaluated 34 distinct brain representations, varying in parcellation and feature type.
Examined how different brain representations affect measurements of inter-subject variability.

Main Results:

Persistent homology effectively compared brain representations in the context of individual differences.
The choice of feature type significantly influences results derived from different brain representations.
Variability in brain representations impacts the measurement of inter-subject differences.

Conclusions:

Feature type is a critical consideration when comparing findings across different rfMRI brain representations.
Methodological choices in brain representation significantly affect the assessment of individual differences.
Standardized approaches are needed to improve the replicability and generalizability of rfMRI findings.