Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

A High-throughput Assay for the Prediction of Chemical Toxicity by Automated Phenotypic Profiling of Caenorhabditis elegans
Published on: March 14, 2019
AI-driven hazard prioritization of plastic additives using Tox21 bioassays and self-supervised graph transformers
Donghyeon Kim1, Eungyeong Lee2, Youngmin Yi3
1School of Environmental Engineering.
Abstract:
As plastics degrade into micro- and nano-sized particles, they can leach additive chemicals into the environment, potentially exerting greater toxicity than the polymer matrix itself. The ECHA Plastic Additives Initiative has compiled a list of more than 400 plastic additives that are used in high volumes. This study aimed to screen the potential toxicity of these chemicals using Tox21 bioassays and deep learning models. To this end, we collected the Tox21 dataset, which provides extensive bioactivity profiles for over 7,000 chemicals across various endpoints, including human nuclear receptor signaling and stress response pathways. We then trained deep learning models using experimental data from Tox21 bioassays. Specifically, we employed the GROVER algorithm, which was designed to overcome typical limitations of traditional graph neural networks by leveraging transformers and self-supervised pretraining. We fine-tuned the model on twelve Tox21 bioassay datasets, using the F1 score as the primary evaluation metric. As a result, the GROVER model outperformed baseline algorithms, including graph convolutional networks, random forest, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Using the fine-tuned GROVER models, we identified 78 highly active chemicals among 171 additives. For these active plastic additive chemicals, we also investigated existing hazard information (minimal oral point-of-departure) from the CompTox Chemical Dashboard and their Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) information from PubChem DB. This approach revealed significant data gaps for plastic additive chemicals with potential toxicity and can support regulatory decision-making. Collectively, this study provides a practical use case for applying cutting-edge AI models as new approach methodologies (NAMs) to modernize hazard assessment, in alignment with the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) principle for animal testing.
More Related Videos
05:47In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
Published on: August 28, 2019
17:28Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Based Developmental Toxicity Assays for Chemical Safety Screening and Systems Biology Data Generation
Published on: June 17, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Deleterious Substances in Aggregate
Another type of impurity is clay and fine material that...
Types of Toxins
Air pollutants, primarily gases, pose significant threats to respiratory health, leading to conditions like hypoxia, lung cancer, and in extreme cases, death.
Environmental pollutants like...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Toxic Reactions: Overview
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...