Soldiers experience fit issues, musculoskeletal pain, and equipment and mobility interference with military body
Brooke R Brisbine1, Richard H Molloy2, Greg L Carstairs2
1Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.
Introduction:
This study aimed to compare fit, musculoskeletal pain and interference issues experienced by male and female Australian soldiers when wearing body armour, as well as quantify the extent to which anthropometric characteristics contribute to these issues.
Methods:
77 male and 12 female Australian soldiers completed a questionnaire about their perception of body armour, including questions about fit, musculoskeletal pain, interference with other equipment and mobility restrictions.
Results:
Females experienced disproportionate challenges with body armour fit, particularly excessive length and width, leading to greater musculoskeletal pain, equipment interference and mobility restrictions. Males also reported issues with body armour being too long and limiting mobility during occupational tasks. Front length was the strongest predictor of body armour-related issues, affecting mobility, comfort and acceptability more than chest breadth or circumference.
Conclusion:
Body armour size and design modifications, particularly to system length, are necessary to improve fit and occupational performance.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Disorders of the Skeletal Muscle
Musculoskeletal disorders
Musculoskeletal disorders involve injuries and conditions affecting the skeletal muscles and associated connective tissues. These disorders can arise from acute biomechanical stresses or chronic overuse and can occur across different age groups. Common injuries include sprains, fractures, and muscular strains, often resulting from...
Cognitive Dissonance


