Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Contribution of First Contact With a Cardiologist to the Door-to-Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Time in Patients
Toshinori Ko1, Yusuke Hosokawa1, Kuniya Asai2
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School Musashi-Kosugi Hospital.
Insights
Reducing door-to-cardiac catheterization laboratory (D2C) time to under 39 minutes in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with cardiogenic shock (CS) significantly lowers in-hospital mortality. Prompt cardiologist intervention is key to improving outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
- Cardiovascular Intervention
Background:
- Current guidelines advocate for early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients experiencing cardiogenic shock (CS).
- However, achieving guideline-recommended first medical contact-to-device times remains a challenge, with only 40% of patients meeting the criteria.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate factors contributing to treatment delays in AMI patients with CS.
- To assess the impact of door-to-cardiac catheterization laboratory (D2C) time on in-hospital mortality.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 369 patients with AMI complicated by CS from the Kanagawa-Acute Cardiovascular Registry.
- Patients were divided into two groups based on median D2C time: ≤39 minutes and >39 minutes.
- Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of mortality.
Main Results:
- A D2C time of ≤39 minutes was associated with a significantly lower in-hospital mortality rate (18.8% vs. 37.6%, P<0.001).
- Patients with shorter D2C times were more likely to be initially seen by a cardiologist and present with chest pain.
- Delays in D2C time were independently linked to non-cardiologist initial contact, absence of chest pain, higher heart rate, and elevated creatinine levels.
Conclusions:
- Shorter D2C times (≤39 minutes) are correlated with reduced mortality in AMI patients with CS.
- Optimizing in-hospital workflows and ensuring cardiologists are the primary responders can decrease D2C time and improve patient outcomes.
Background:
Current guidelines recommend early revascularization in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, guideline-recommended first medical contact-to-device times is reportedly achieved in only 40% of patients.
Methods And Results:
We retrospectively analyzed 369 patients with AMI complicated by CS from the Kanagawa-Acute Cardiovascular Registry to evaluate factors influencing delays in treatment and their effect on in-hospital mortality. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on the median door-to-cardiac catheterization laboratory (D2C) time (≤39 or >39 min). In the group with D2C time ≤39 min, the first-contact physician was more frequently a cardiologist (71.9% vs. 47.0%; P<0.001) and significantly more patients had chest pain as the chief complaint (70.3% vs. 47.4%; P<0.001). Although pre- and post-percutaneous coronary intervention Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow was similar between the 2 groups, in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the D2C time ≤39 min group (18.8% vs. 37.6%; P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that D2C time >39 min was independently associated with a non-cardiologist being the first-contact physician, the absence of chest pain, a higher heart rate, and elevated creatinine levels.
Conclusions:
D2C time ≤39 min is correlated with reduced mortality in AMI patients with CS. Implementing systems to ensure cardiologists are the initial responders and optimizing in-hospital workflows could reduce the D2C time and improve outcomes.
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
07:39Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction