Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.6K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.6K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.4K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.4K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.5K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.5K
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control01:21

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control

393
Phase-lag controllers are widely used in control systems to improve stability and reduce steady-state errors. A dimmer switch controlling the brightness of a light bulb serves as a practical example of phase-lag control, gradually adjusting the bulb's brightness. Mathematically, phase-lag control or low-pass filtering is represented when the factor 'a' is less than 1.
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any...
393
Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule01:10

Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule

2.4K
In the AX proton spin system, proton A can sense the two spin states of a coupled proton X, resulting in a doublet NMR signal with two peaks of equal (1:1) intensity. When proton A is coupled to two equivalent protons (AX2 spin system), the spin states of each X can be aligned with or against the external field, creating three possible scenarios. This results in a 1:2:1  triplet signal, where the central peak corresponds to the chemical shift of A and is twice as large or intense as the...
2.4K
Biasing of Metal-Semiconductor Junctions01:27

Biasing of Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

555
Biasing metal-semiconductor junctions involves applying a voltage across the junction. Specifically, the metal is connected to a voltage source, while the semiconductor is grounded. This technique is essential for controlling the direction and magnitude of current flow in electronic devices, including diodes, transistors, and photovoltaic cells.
In Schottky junctions, where the semiconductor is n-type, applying a positive voltage to the metal relative to the semiconductor reduces its Fermi...
555

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using Near-Flat-Band Electrons for Read-Out of Molecular Spin Qubit Entangled States.

ACS nano·2026
Same author

Simulating decoherence of two coupled spins using the generalized cluster correlation expansion.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

Long-Lived Topological Flatband Excitons in Semiconductor Moiré Heterostructures: A Bosonic Kane-Mele Model Platform.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Eliashberg Theory for Dynamical Screening in Bilayer Exciton Condensation.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Machine Learning the Disorder Landscape of Majorana Nanowires.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Engineering the Kitaev Spin Liquid in a Quantum Dot System.

Physical review letters·2024
Same journal

Erratum: Spectroscopy and Ground-State Transfer of Ultracold Bosonic ^{39}K^{133}Cs Molecules [Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 203401 (2025)].

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Erratum: Lifetime of the ^{2}F_{7/2} Level in Yb^{+} for Spontaneous Emission of Electric Octupole Radiation [Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 213001 (2021)].

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Laser-Plasma Based Seeded Free Electron Laser in the High-Gain Regime.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Parent Hamiltonians for Stabilizer Quantum Many-Body Scars.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Properties of Heavy Cosmic Nuclei Phosphorus, Chlorine, Argon, Potassium, and Calcium: Results from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Role of Spin-Isospin Symmetries in Nuclear β-Decays.

Physical review letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

9.6K

Singlet-Only Always-On Gapless Exchange Qubits with Baseband Control.

Nathan L Foulk1, Silas Hoffman1,2, Katharina Laubscher1

  • 1University of Maryland, Condensed Matter Theory Center and Joint Quantum Institute, Department of Physics, College Park, Maryland 20742-4111, USA.

Physical Review Letters
|September 22, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We introduce the singlet-only always-on gapless exchange (SAGE) spin qubit, offering improved coherence and simplified gates. This novel qubit design enhances quantum computing performance by suppressing errors from magnetic field gradients.

More Related Videos

Silicon Metal-oxide-semiconductor Quantum Dots for Single-electron Pumping
14:58

Silicon Metal-oxide-semiconductor Quantum Dots for Single-electron Pumping

Published on: June 3, 2015

15.4K
Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform
05:39

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform

Published on: August 2, 2019

10.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

9.6K
Silicon Metal-oxide-semiconductor Quantum Dots for Single-electron Pumping
14:58

Silicon Metal-oxide-semiconductor Quantum Dots for Single-electron Pumping

Published on: June 3, 2015

15.4K
Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform
05:39

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform

Published on: August 2, 2019

10.2K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum computing
  • Spintronics
  • Solid-state physics

Background:

  • Conventional exchange-only qubits face challenges with magnetic field gradients and nuclear environments.
  • Leakage and coherent errors limit the performance of current spin qubit architectures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and analyze a novel spin qubit, the singlet-only always-on gapless exchange (SAGE) qubit.
  • To demonstrate the SAGE qubit's resilience against magnetic field gradient noise and leakage errors.
  • To evaluate the performance of SAGE qubits for single- and two-qubit gate operations.

Main Methods:

  • Encoding a single qubit in the spins of four electrons.
  • Utilizing always-on exchange interactions to create a protected qubit subspace.
  • Simulating qubit dynamics under realistic noise models, including magnetic gradient and charge noise.

Main Results:

  • The SAGE qubit subspace is protected from coherent errors induced by local magnetic field gradients.
  • Leakage out of the computational subspace is energetically suppressed due to continuous exchange interactions.
  • Coherence times improve by an order of magnitude, and single-qubit gate infidelities decrease significantly compared to conventional exchange-only qubits under dominant magnetic gradient noise.
  • Two-qubit gates are achieved with a single interqubit exchange pulse, featuring simplified sequences and comparable durations to existing methods.

Conclusions:

  • The SAGE qubit offers a promising advancement for robust quantum information processing.
  • Its inherent protection mechanisms and simplified gate operations pave the way for more scalable and reliable quantum computers.
  • The SAGE qubit architecture demonstrates superior performance in realistic noise environments dominated by magnetic gradients.