From coop to table: How increased welfare conditions shape chicken meat quality
Joanna Składanowska-Baryza1, Ewa Sell-Kubiak2, Patryk Sztandarski3
1Poznań University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal Breeding and Product Quality Assessment, Słoneczna 1, 62-002 Poznań, Poland.
Poultry Science
|September 22, 2025
Summary
Housing and chicken genotype significantly impact breast meat quality. Free-range systems with JA757 genotype yield tender meat, while indoor systems with JA787 are suitable for processed products.
Area of Science:
- Animal Science
- Food Science
- Poultry Science
Background:
- Consumer demand for high-quality chicken meat is increasing.
- Understanding the interplay between broiler genetics and housing systems is crucial for optimizing meat characteristics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of two housing systems (free-range vs. indoor) and two slow-growing chicken genotypes (Hubbard JA 757 and JA 787) on breast meat quality.
- To assess physicochemical properties, color, water-holding capacity, texture, chemical composition, and muscle myopathies.
Main Methods:
- 120 Hubbard broilers were allocated to four groups (genotype × housing).
- Pectoralis major muscle was analyzed for pH, color, water-holding capacity, texture, composition, and myopathies (Spaghetti Meat, Wooden Breast, White Striping).
Main Results:
- Housing significantly affected meat color (b* and C* values) and fat content.
- Genotype influenced texture (Young's Modulus) and Spaghetti Meat prevalence.
- Spaghetti Meat was higher in JA787 birds and indoor systems; housing × genotype interaction affected pH48 and cooking loss.
Conclusions:
- Genotype primarily influences meat texture and myopathy incidence.
- Housing conditions significantly impact pH, pigmentation, water retention, and fat content.
- Optimizing meat quality requires aligning broiler genotype with the rearing environment for specific market needs.
Related Concept Videos
Complementation Tests
6.1K
A complementation test is a simple cross to identify whether the two mutations are located on the same gene or different genes. It was first performed by Edward Lewis in the 1940s while working on fruit flies. He developed the test to identify the location and arrangement of different mutations on chromosomes.
Organisms heterozygous for different mutations are crossed pairwise in all combinations. If present on different genes, the mutations can complement each other by providing the missing...
Organisms heterozygous for different mutations are crossed pairwise in all combinations. If present on different genes, the mutations can complement each other by providing the missing...
6.1K
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
7.4K
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
7.4K


