Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Plagiarism detection across languages: a comprehensive study of Arabic and English-to-Arabic long documents
Ahmad Abdelaal1, Abdallah Elsaadany1, Abdelrhman Ahmed Medhat1
1School of Information Technology and Computer Science, Nile University, Giza, Egypt.
Abstract:
Plagiarism detection in Arabic texts remains a significant challenge due to the complex morphological structure, rich linguistic diversity, and scarcity of high-quality labeled datasets. This study proposes a robust framework for Arabic plagiarism detection by integrating Siamese neural networks (SNN) with state-of-the-art transformer architectures, specifically AraT5 and Longformer. The system employs a hybrid workflow, combining transformer-based encoders and a classification objective to implicitly learn textual similarity. To address the inherent imbalance in Arabic plagiarism datasets, both weighted cross-entropy loss and Dice loss functions were utilized to optimize model training. Extensive experiments were conducted using the ExAraCorpusPAN2015 dataset, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed architecture. Results indicate that AraT5 with weighted cross-entropy loss outperformed other configurations, achieving an F1-score of 0.9058. Additionally, comparative analysis with existing methodologies highlights the superiority of our approach in handling nuanced semantic and structural variations within Arabic texts. This study underscores the importance of transformer-based architectures and class-specific loss functions in enhancing plagiarism detection accuracy in under-resourced languages like Arabic.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Proofreading
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase...
Proofreading
Improving Translational Accuracy
Improving Translational Accuracy
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

