Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026
Author Spotlight: Integrating Alveolar-Capillary Reserve Measurements in Exercise Adaptation and Therapeutic Strategies
Published on: February 2, 2024
Non-zero risk of adverse psychological reactions induced by experimental dyspnoea studies in healthy volunteers:
Sophie Lavault1,2, Marie-Cécile Niérat1, Nathalie Nion1,3
1Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Paris, France.
Background:
Experimentally inducing dyspnoea in healthy volunteers is a powerful research tool. Even though this approach is not considered to carry particular risks, dyspnoea occurs in a general context of stress. We hypothesised that experimental dyspnoea could be traumatic in some individuals, with immediate or delayed adverse psychological reactions.
Methods:
40 participants (median (interquartile range) age 38.7 (29.7-49.1) years; 20 women) were exposed, in random order, to inspiratory threshold loading (ITL; "excessive breathing effort"; unpleasantness rating 6 (4-7) on a 0-10 scale) and carbon dioxide stimulation with restricted ventilatory response (CO2-rv; "air hunger"; unpleasantness rating 7 (7-8)). Participants were evaluated immediately after induced dyspnoea, at 7 days and after a further 3 months.
Results:
Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) scores were higher immediately after CO2-rv than after ITL (3 (1-6.5) versus 2 (0-3); p<0.0001). After 7 days, six participants (15%) had an Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) score ≥12 (high risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)). They had significantly higher baseline anxiety trait indicators than the participants with an IES-R score <12 (baseline Anxiety Sensitivity Index 27.5 (14.75-61.25) versus 10 (3-19); p=0.0087). At 3 months, no participant had a PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) score suggestive of PTSD (1 (0-4), range 0-23, threshold 33) but the six participants with IES-R ≥12 on day 7 had significantly higher PCL-5 scores (13.5 (1-21.5) versus 0 (0-4); p=0.0014).
Conclusions:
Although no severe situations were encountered, this study highlights the need for caution when designing experimental dyspnoea studies, particularly when involving individuals with high trait anxiety.
Related Concept Videos
01:15Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
01:56Ethics in Research
01:19Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...