Dynamic analysis for PFAS removal from contaminated water by foam separation based on machine learning models
Xin Liu1, Yanyan Liang1, Libin Yang1
1State Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Green Resource Recycling, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Environmental Research
|September 24, 2025
Summary
Machine learning, specifically XGBoost, optimizes foam separation for removing persistent per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The PFAS-XGB model identifies key factors like aeration time and PFAS properties for efficient environmental remediation.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Chemical Engineering
- Data Science
Background:
- Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent global environmental contaminants with known toxicity.
- Foam separation (FS) is a promising, cost-effective remediation technique for PFAS removal.
- FS efficiency is highly variable due to complex interactions between parameters.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a predictive model for optimizing foam separation efficiency in PFAS remediation.
- To identify key factors influencing PFAS removal using machine learning.
- To establish a data-driven framework for enhancing FS performance.
Main Methods:
- Evaluation of six machine learning (ML) models for predicting PFAS removal efficiency.
- Development of an improved extreme gradient boosting (XGB) model, termed PFAS-XGB.
- Analysis of model interpretation and causal contribution of various factors.
Main Results:
- Extreme gradient boosting (XGB) demonstrated the highest predictive performance (R²).
- The PFAS-XGB model streamlined input variables and enhanced prediction efficiency.
- Aeration time and PFAS molecular weight were identified as critical determinants of removal efficiency.
- Operational conditions (56.8%) had the most significant impact, followed by PFAS properties (21.9%), surfactants (16.8%), and metal activators (4.5%).
Conclusions:
- Machine learning provides a robust framework for optimizing foam separation in PFAS remediation.
- Operational parameters are the primary drivers of FS efficiency, but surfactant and metal activator impacts are significant.
- The study offers actionable insights for improving PFAS removal strategies through data-driven optimization.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Typical Model Studies
619
Fluid mechanics model studies often utilize scaled-down systems to predict fluid behavior in full-scale environments, such as river flows, dam spillways, and structures interacting with open surfaces. Maintaining Froude number similarity in river models is crucial, as it replicates surface flow features like wave patterns and velocities.
619
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
290
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
290
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway
678
Scaled hydraulic models of dam spillways provide a practical way to replicate and study the intricate flow dynamics of these structures. Often built to a 1:15 ratio, these models allow for observing critical water behavior, such as velocity distribution, flow patterns, and energy dissipation.
678
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
249
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
249


