Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Meta-analysis to Investigate the Correlation Between Event-Free Survival and Overall Survival in Patients with
Dandan Zheng1, Ali Mojebi2, Yuexin Tang3
1Value and Implementation, Outcomes Research, Merck & Co., Inc., 126 East Lincoln Avenue, Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA. dandan.zheng@merck.com.
Introduction:
While overall survival (OS) is a widely accepted trial endpoint in oncology, survival data are often immature in early-stage populations. Alternative time-to-event outcomes have been considered by regulatory and reimbursement agencies to allow for early patient access. Event-free survival (EFS) has shown strong correlations with OS in patients with locally advanced (LA) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and within the subgroup with unresectable tumors. With novel neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapies being investigated in resectable LA-HNSCC, this study aimed to assess the trial-level correlation of EFS and OS in patients with resectable LA-HNSCC.
Methods:
A systematic review (October 29, 2024) identified randomized controlled trials evaluating surgery with adjuvant therapy, neoadjuvant therapy, or both in patients with resectable LA-HNSCC. Trials reporting hazard ratios (HRs) or Kaplan-Meier curves for OS (time from randomization to death) and EFS (time from randomization to disease progression/recurrence or death) were eligible for the analysis. Base case included trials comparing neoadjuvant therapy + surgery + adjuvant therapy versus surgery + adjuvant therapy. Sensitivity analyses included models with trials comparing broader regimens (e.g., adjuvant therapy versus adjuvant therapy), excluding an outlier trial and restricting to publications after 2004. Correlations were measured between log(EFS HR) and log(OS HR) using regression models, with their strength measured using Pearson's correlation coefficient (R).
Results:
The review included 45 trials, with 20 trials qualifying for correlation analysis. R (95% confidence interval) was 0.91 (0.36, 0.99) in the base case (n = 5 trials) and 0.41 (-0.01, 0.71; n = 20), 0.78 (0.52, 0.91; n = 19), and 0.76 (0.41, 0.92; n = 13) in the three sensitivity analyses, respectively.
Conclusion:
Strong trial-level correlations were observed between EFS and OS, suggesting EFS is a valid surrogate for OS in patients with resectable LA-HNSCC, particularly in trials investigating neoadjuvant therapy + surgery + adjuvant therapy.
More Related Videos
06:11Therapy Testing in a Spheroid-based 3D Cell Culture Model for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: April 20, 2018
07:29Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
Published on: April 22, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...