Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026
Single-cell Profiling of Developing and Mature Retinal Neurons
Published on: April 19, 2012
Comparative Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis of c-Met Receptor Expressing and Non-Expressing Projection Neurons in
Ramin Ali Marandi Ghoddousi1,2, Pat Levitt3,4, Zia Rady5
1Developmental Neuroscience and Neurogenetics Program, The Saban Research Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA, rghoddousi@g.ucla.edu.
Introduction:
Single-cell transcriptomic analyses in adult mice show that cortical projection neuron subclasses exhibit heterogenous gene expression profiles that reflect their projection targets and laminar and areal positions. Further analyses revealed that projection neurons within the same subclass also exhibit transcriptomic heterogeneity. Recent evidence suggests that differences in maturation state reflect one source of this heterogeneity. The MET receptor tyrosine kinase, a regulator of synapse maturation, is expressed in a subpopulation within cortical projection neuron subclasses, providing an experimental model to address transcriptomic heterogeneity within developing projection neuron subclasses.
Methods:
Single-cell RNA sequencing and smFISH were used to identify transcriptomic differences between Met+ and Met- projection neuron populations in the mouse visual and frontal cortices during the early phase of synapse formation and dendritic growth.
Results:
Analyses confirmed enrichment of Met in select projection neuron subclasses and further identified astrocytes as the major source of its ligand, Hgf. No genes were expressed uniquely in Met+ or Met- projection neurons within a subclass; rather, there were graded differences in gene expression between the populations. While the identity of differentially expressed genes varied between subclass and cortical area, there was a consistent overrepresentation of genes associated with axon growth, as well as synapse structure, development, and function, with a subset associated with the MET interactome. Further, compared to Met- projection neurons, expression differences in genes associated with maturation indicate less mature excitatory synapses and spines in the Met+ population at this age.
Conclusion:
The current findings provide support for the hypothesis that Met+ projection neurons are in a less mature state than Met- projection neurons within the same subclass. Further, the data are consistent with converging lines of biochemical and electrophysiological evidence that MET contributes to asynchronous maturation of developing cortical circuits.
