Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
Published on: March 29, 2019
Effectiveness of teaching basic life support resuscitation using virtual reality - a randomized controlled trial.
Piotr Konrad Leszczyński1, Klaudia Weronika Jędral2, Maria Malm3
1Department of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Siedlce, Konarskiego 2, Siedlce, 08-110, Poland. piotr.leszczynski@uws.edu.pl.
Virtual reality (VR) training for basic life support (BLS) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) shows comparable three-month effectiveness to traditional methods. While short-term results favored traditional training, VR improved long-term chest compression quality.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Emergency Medicine
- Virtual Reality Applications
Background:
- Basic Life Support (BLS) skills are crucial for emergency response and survival rates.
- Traditional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training methods are widely used, but their long-term effectiveness varies.
- Limited data exists on the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) for teaching BLS and CPR procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the short-term and three-month didactic effectiveness of VR technology in teaching BLS procedures and chest compressions.
- To compare the learning outcomes and skill retention between VR training and traditional training methods.
- To assess participant satisfaction with VR-based versus traditional CPR training.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 205 participants (73.91% women, mean age 21.80 years) was conducted.
- Participants were allocated to either a VR training group or a traditional training group.
- Knowledge and practical skills were assessed immediately after training and again at three months using checklists and statistical analyses (α=0.05).
Main Results:
- Immediately after training, traditional methods yielded higher overall resuscitation quality scores (67.0%) compared to VR (45.61%, p<0.001), though knowledge levels were comparable (p=0.269).
- At three months, no significant intergroup differences in resuscitation quality were observed (p=0.218), with traditional group at 60.32% and VR group at 54.32%.
- Notably, chest compression quality decreased after traditional training but improved after VR training over the three months.
Conclusions:
- VR-based CPR training demonstrates comparable three-month effectiveness to traditional methods, particularly in improving chest compression quality.
- Modern VR technology offers a viable alternative for first aid education, potentially reducing instructor involvement and ensuring procedural consistency for large groups.
- While short-term results favored traditional training, the long-term retention and improvement in specific skills like chest compressions highlight the potential of VR in medical education.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use

