Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Cardiovascular Profile of Patients with Metabolic Syndrome
Published on: September 27, 2024
Fat distribution, inflammatory mechanisms, and cardiovascular disease risk: mediation analysis based on the
Zhuangzhuang Chen1, Jun Li1, Hao Rao1
1First Clinical College, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065, China.
Objective:
To examine the association between fat distribution and 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, and to evaluate the mediating roles of inflammatory markers in this relationship.
Methods:
Data were obtained from the 2017-2018 cycle of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), including 4,741 participants aged ≥ 30 years. Fat distribution was assessed using body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and regional fat percentages (upper limbs, lower limbs, trunk, and total body) measured via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The Framingham Risk Score (FRS) was used to estimate 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Multivariable linear regression models were applied to evaluate the associations between fat distribution and FRS. In addition, mediation analysis was performed to assess the indirect effects of inflammatory markers-including C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)-on the relationship between fat distribution and FRS. All analyses were stratified by sex.
Results:
In men, the total fat percentage showed the strongest positive correlation with the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) (β = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.07-0.10), followed by the trunk fat percentage (β = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.08-0.11) and BMI (β = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.06-0.08). C-reactive protein (CRP) exhibited a significant mediating effect in the relationship between total fat and FRS (indirect effect = 0.019, 95% CI: 0.015-0.025), with a mediation proportion of 23.1%. In women, total fat percentage demonstrated a significant "U-shaped" nonlinear relationship with FRS (P_nonlinear = 0.046), with risk increasing sharply when body fat exceeded approximately 35%. In the fully adjusted model, the three major fat distribution indicators influencing FRS were total fat percentage (β= 0.11, 95% CI: 0.07-0.14), trunk fat percentage (β = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.07-0.14), and BMI (β = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.07-0.11). The mediating effect of CRP was the most significant (indirect effect = 0.041, 95% CI: 0.031-0.054), with a mediation proportion of 38.1%.
Conclusion:
Different fat distribution patterns exert varying influences on long-term cardiovascular risk, with total body fat percentage showing the strongest association with increased risk. Inflammatory responses may serve as key biological mediators linking fat distribution to cardiovascular disease (CVD), highlighting the importance of monitoring and managing inflammation to reduce CVD risk.
More Related Videos
13:07Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
11:06Network Pharmacology Prediction and Metabolomics Validation of the Mechanism of Fructus Phyllanthi against Hyperlipidemia
Published on: April 7, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Cholesterol: Significance and Regulation
Considering cholesterol and...
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Inflammation
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures