Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Developing National Priority Assistive Products Lists: experiences and lessons from six Sub-Saharan African countries
Sarah Anderson1,2,3, Frederic Seghers4, Lillian Saunders5
1Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Developing national priority assistive products lists (APLs) in Sub-Saharan Africa requires multi-stakeholder engagement and integration with health systems. These APLs are crucial for improving assistive technology access for people with disabilities.
Area of Science:
- Global Health
- Disability Studies
- Health Systems Strengthening
Background:
- Assistive technology (AT) access remains a significant challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
- National Priority Assistive Products Lists (APLs) are essential tools for organizing and improving AT provision.
- Limited research exists on the practical experiences of developing APLs in diverse LMIC contexts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the experiences and lessons learned from six Sub-Saharan African countries in developing National Priority Assistive Products Lists (APLs) from 2020 to 2024.
- To provide actionable insights for enhancing AT access in LMICs through effective APL development.
- To identify facilitators and barriers in the APL creation process.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative descriptive methodology.
- Multi-faceted approach including desktop review of documentation and publications.
- Semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders (n=9) across six countries.
Main Results:
- Multi-stakeholder engagement is critical for successful APL development.
- Common challenges include limited data availability, varied prioritization frameworks, and the need for local context adaptation.
- Facilitators include strong government leadership and integration with existing health systems, despite funding and regulatory barriers.
Conclusions:
- Developing National APLs is a complex process requiring inclusive stakeholder input.
- Data-driven prioritization and integration into health system strengthening are vital for effective APLs.
- These findings offer guidance for other LMICs aiming to improve AT access and uphold disability rights.
Related Concept Videos
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Principles of Disease Surveillance
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...

