Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Comparative Lesions Analysis Through a Targeted Sequencing Approach
Published on: November 5, 2019
Comparison of somatic variant oncogenicity classification using ClinGen/CGC/VICC guidelines and QIAGEN Clinical
Aarthi Goverdhan1, Lisa Mullineaux2, Amber Pryzbylski2
1QIAGEN, 1001 Marshall St Ste 200, Redwood City, CA.
Accurate classification of cancer variants is crucial for precision oncology. This study found that the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), and Variant Interpretation for Cancer Consortium (VICC) standards, when used with decision support tools, effectively classify somatic variants.
Area of Science:
- Genomic medicine
- Cancer genomics
- Clinical informatics
Background:
- Accurate clinical interpretation of somatic cancer variants is essential for diagnosis and precision oncology treatment.
- Increasing genomic sequencing depth and breadth led to independent laboratory standards for somatic variant classification.
- A collaborative set of standards was published by the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), and Variant Interpretation for Cancer Consortium (VICC).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the ClinGen/CGC/VICC standards for somatic variant classification.
- To compare these standards against classifications from a clinical decision support software system (QIAGEN Clinical Insight - QCI Interpret One).
- To assess the concordance between automated and consensus-based somatic variant classifications.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a published variant set for validation.
- Expanded the dataset with real-world cancer variants from Mayo Clinic retrospective oncology cases.
- Compared classifications generated by the ClinGen/CGC/VICC system with those from the QCI Interpret One system.
Main Results:
- Automated classifications by the QCI system showed 97.2% concordance with ClinGen/CGC/VICC assessed classifications for "oncogenic" and "likely oncogenic" variants.
- The ClinGen/CGC/VICC standards resulted in more conservative classifications, with a higher proportion of variants designated as "variant of unknown significance" or "likely benign."
- Demonstrated effective combined use of guidelines and decision support tools.
Conclusions:
- The ClinGen/CGC/VICC guidelines provide a robust framework for somatic variant classification.
- Clinical decision support tools, like QCI Interpret One, can be effectively integrated with these guidelines.
- The combined approach facilitates accurate somatic variant classification and interpretation in clinical oncology settings.
More Related Videos
07:59Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
09:34Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...