Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research
Published on: June 7, 2024
Arm circumference as a marker of muscle mass: cutoff values from NHANES 1999-2006
Jarson P Costa-Pereira1, Carla M Prado2, Steven B Heymsfield3
1Postgraduate Program in Nutrition, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Background:
Although mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is a potential marker of skeletal muscle (SM), no study has proposed MUAC cutoff points using a large young reference population. Additionally, growing evidence highlights the impact of excess adiposity on anthropometric markers, which can mask their value in evaluating SM.
Objectives:
This study aimed to propose cutoff points for MUAC as a marker of muscle mass, along with BMI-adjustment factors for individuals outside the normal BMI range (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), using data from the NHANES 1999-2006 sample.
Methods:
Anthropometric and appendicular lean soft tissue (ALST; by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) data from the adult NHANES sample (aged ≥18 y) were divided into sex, age, ethnicity, and self-reported race subgroups. Adults aged 18-39 y with a BMI of 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 were used as the reference population, and MUAC cutoff points were derived at 1 and 2 SDs below the mean. Pearson's correlation (r) was used to assess the correlation between MUAC and ALST. Survey-weighted linear regression analysis was used to derive BMI-adjustment factors for MUAC.
Results:
A total of 18,195 individuals were included (weighted proportion: 49.4% male; mean age: 43.9 y, 95% confidence interval: 43.4, 44.4 y). MUAC showed a strong positive correlation with ALST index (ALST/height2) (r = 0.83 for males, r = 0.79 for females). Rounded cutoff points for low MUAC were 28 cm (male) and 25 cm (female) and for very low MUAC were 26 cm (male) and 23 cm (female). Overall BMI-adjustment factors were: -3 cm (male), -2 cm (female) (BMI: 25-29.9 kg/m2); -7 cm (male), -6 cm (female) (BMI: 30-39.9 kg/m2); -10 cm (male), -9 cm (female) (BMI: ≥40 kg/m2).
Conclusions:
This study proposes practical MUAC cutoff points, a potential marker of SM, along with BMI adjustment factors for individuals with excess weight, aiming to reduce errors in using MUAC for this purpose. Our results have the potential to enhance clinical routine assessments.
Related Concept Videos
Signs of Puberty
Changes in the Appendicular Skeleton with Age
Initially, the limb buds consist of a core of mesenchyme covered by a layer of ectoderm. The ectoderm at the end of the limb bud thickens to form a narrow crest called the apical ectodermal ridge. This ridge stimulates the underlying...

