Checkpoint-Dependent Sensitivities to Nucleoside Analogues Uncover Specific Patterns of Genomic Instability

Zainab Burhanuddin Kagalwala1,2, Mohammed Ayan Chhipa1,3, Zohreh Kianfard1,3

  • 1Department of Chemistry and Biology, Faculty of Science, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.

PubMed

Insights

DNA replication checkpoint mutations create unique sensitivities to nucleoside analogues. Understanding these profiles can predict drug resistance and personalize cancer treatment strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Cancer Research

Background:

  • Nucleoside analogues are vital in medicine and research, but their impact on cell sensitivity and mutagenesis remains unclear.
  • This knowledge gap is critical for cancer therapy, especially when DNA damage response pathways are compromised.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how DNA replication checkpoint mutations affect sensitivity to various nucleoside analogues.
  • To explore the potential for predicting drug resistance and informing clinical strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Tested six nucleoside analogues in the fission yeast model organism, *Schizosaccharomyces pombe*.
  • Compared growth inhibition and DNA mis-segregation across different checkpoint-deficient yeast strains.
  • Determined half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for each analogue.

Main Results:

  • Checkpoint mutations conferred unique sensitivities to chemotherapeutic (gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, cytarabine) and non-clinical (bromodeoxyuridine) analogues.
  • Antiretroviral nucleoside analogues (zidovudine, lamivudine) did not significantly affect cell growth.
  • Doses of gemcitabine and bromodeoxyuridine above IC50 paradoxically promoted growth and led to resistance upon re-exposure, particularly in DNA replication checkpoint mutants (*cds1∆*, *rad3∆*).

Conclusions:

  • DNA replication checkpoint status significantly influences cellular response to nucleoside analogues.
  • Resistance to nucleoside analogues can be predictable, especially in specific mutant backgrounds.
  • Integrating nucleoside analogue sensitivity data with personal genomics could optimize cancer drug selection, dosage, and scheduling.

Related Concept Videos

DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle02:36

DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle

In response to DNA damage, cells can pause the cell cycle to assess and repair the breaks. However, the cell must check the DNA at certain critical stages during the cell cycle. If the cell cycle pauses before DNA replication, the cells will contain twice the amount of DNA. On the other hand, if cells arrest after DNA replication but before mitosis, they will contain four times the normal amount of DNA. With a host of specialized proteins at their disposal,cells must use the right protein at...
10.0K
Biosynthesis of Nucleic Acids01:28

Biosynthesis of Nucleic Acids

Nucleic acid biosynthesis is a fundamental biochemical process that produces the purine and pyrimidine nucleotides essential for DNA and RNA synthesis. This pathway maintains a balanced nucleotide pool, preventing imbalances that could jeopardize genetic integrity and cellular function. Given the crucial role of nucleotides, their synthesis is tightly regulated to ensure proper cellular homeostasis.Purine BiosynthesisThe biosynthesis of purine nucleotides begins with ribose-5-phosphate, a...
985
Nucleotide Excision Repair01:38

Nucleotide Excision Repair

DNA Distortion and Damage
Cells are regularly exposed to mutagens—factors in the environment that can damage DNA and generate mutations. UV radiation is one of the most common mutagens and is estimated to introduce a significant number of changes in DNA. These include bends or kinks in the structure, which can block DNA replication or transcription. If these errors are not fixed, the damage can cause mutations, which in turn can result in cancer or disease depending on which sequences are...
5.0K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
7.9K