The cost-effectiveness of education and support group interventions aimed at promoting breastfeeding
Ifigeneia Mavranezouli1, Sharangini Rajesh2, Shalmali Deshpande2
1Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Breastfeeding, especially exclusive, is associated with long-lasting health benefits to mothers and babies and healthcare cost-savings; however, breastfeeding rates are low in many high-income countries. Education and support interventions are effective in promoting breastfeeding but evidence on their cost-effectiveness is limited, uncertain, or negative. Our study objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of group-based breastfeeding interventions from the National Health Service (NHS) and Personal Social Services (PSS) perspective in England. We used decision-analytic modelling to estimate incremental costs, clinical benefits (prevention of infections and death in babies, prevention of breast cancer in mothers) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of group breastfeeding interventions from the NHS/PSS perspective in England. A systematic review and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials was performed to estimate intervention effectiveness, while data on the benefits of breastfeeding were obtained from large published meta-analyses. Other model inputs were derived from published literature and national statistics. Compared with standard care alone, group breastfeeding interventions resulted in fewer infections and deaths in babies, fewer cases of breast cancer in mothers and higher QALYs (0.004 per mother-baby dyad), through increased rates of breastfeeding, and yielded cost-savings (£89 per mother-baby dyad) that outweighed intervention costs (£28 per mother-baby dyad). Group interventions that promote breastfeeding by providing education, advice and support to mothers are likely cost-effective in England. Further research should enhance the evidence base on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of breastfeeding interventions, considering their differential effects on different socioeconomic groups and a wider range of clinical benefits of breastfeeding.
Breastfeeding, especially exclusive, is associated with long-lasting health benefits to mothers and babies and healthcare cost-savings; however, breastfeeding rates are low in many high-income countries. Education and support interventions are effective in promoting breastfeeding but evidence on their cost-effectiveness is limited, uncertain, or negative. Our study objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of group-based breastfeeding interventions from the National Health Service (NHS) and Personal Social Services (PSS) perspective in England. We used decision-analytic modelling to estimate incremental costs, clinical benefits (prevention of infections and death in babies, prevention of breast cancer in mothers) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of group breastfeeding interventions from the NHS/PSS perspective in England. A systematic review and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials was performed to estimate intervention effectiveness, while data on the benefits of breastfeeding were obtained from large published meta-analyses. Other model inputs were derived from published literature and national statistics. Compared with standard care alone, group breastfeeding interventions resulted in fewer infections and deaths in babies, fewer cases of breast cancer in mothers and higher QALYs (0.004 per mother-baby dyad), through increased rates of breastfeeding, and yielded cost-savings (£89 per mother-baby dyad) that outweighed intervention costs (£28 per mother-baby dyad). Group interventions that promote breastfeeding by providing education, advice and support to mothers are likely cost-effective in England. Further research should enhance the evidence base on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of breastfeeding interventions, considering their differential effects on different socioeconomic groups and a wider range of clinical benefits of breastfeeding.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
01:30Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
01:26Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
01:28Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
01:20Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...